coalescent: (Default)
Crooked Timber have a virtual seminar up that focuses on Susanna Clarke's wonderful, Hugo- and World Fantasy Award-winning novel, Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell. There are a variety of essays, all linked to from the introduction, and then a response from Clarke, including a thoughtful response to the oft-voiced question, 'where did the female magicians go?', as well as this on the possibilities of fantasy:
Firstly fantasy can be about giving power, strength, importance to the small and weak. Thus the smallest, weakest person—Frodo Baggins to take an example entirely at random—goes off to fulfil the Most Important Task. And turns out to be the only person who could have done it. Ditto Stephen Black.

Secondly Fantasy (and SF) can be the opposite of this. Instead of Giving Importance to People, it can Humble People. It can be about turning our view, however briefly, away from ourselves; it can be about glimpsing that human beings are not always, forever, and irrevocably, the centre of the universe. If you are C.S. Lewis, writing The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, you turn our view away from ourselves to God. (The children become kings and queens —which looks a bit like giving power to the weak, but as they are self-confident, middle-class English children, they never seem that weak or small.) If you are Alan Garner, writing Thursbitch, you turn our view away from ourselves to an actual, historical valley in northern England which stands for all the places in northern England resonating with their own, not-human placeness. I’m with Alan Garner: the landscape of England (particularly Northern England) is the bit of magic we can actually see and touch for ourselves.

I rather like this use of fantasy, partly because is that it’s something we do so much better than the literary fiction people. Literary fiction sticks resolutely to the human. But the world seems to me so much bigger than that.
coalescent: (Default)
Day 1 (pp1-15): First Impressions

It's a big book, but beautiful with it. Clean typesetting, good binding (incorporating a ribbon bookmark), and I like my edition's blackened page-edges.

I've stopped at the end of chapter one only because there's such a lot to assimilate. It never feels like heavy going, but a lot of information is conveyed in those first fifteen pages, and I want to have a clear picture in my head before I go further. Not all of it comes from the narrative, either--there are illustrations, and also a sprinkling of footnotes to fictional scholarly works. Clarke seems to write with the sort of formal, precise language that I, accurately or not, mentally associate with 19th-century Literature. This matches neatly with her treatment of magic as a dry, dead thing, its time passed, its study only dusty scholarship, never practice.

there will be spoilers )

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Profile

coalescent: (Default)
Niall

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jun. 28th, 2025 06:27 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
March 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2012