Proof Copy of the Day
Feb. 9th, 2008 10:07 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Item one: the difference in spelling between the front cover and spine.
Item two: "Female SF writers are a rarity; good ones even scarcer!"
If anyone wants to play guess-the-publisher before clicking through to the photos, feel free. That said, I'm still looking forward to reading it.
Item two: "Female SF writers are a rarity; good ones even scarcer!"
If anyone wants to play guess-the-publisher before clicking through to the photos, feel free. That said, I'm still looking forward to reading it.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-09 11:59 am (UTC)Interesting that you don't seem to think they'd need to indicate if the author was a man :-p
no subject
Date: 2008-02-09 01:06 pm (UTC)I think the lack of indication of Alex Bell's gender may be a case of 'don't tell, don't ask'.
... That said, my friend and I were talking about what he'd been reading lately a couple of weeks ago, and I asked him if he had read anything by China Mieville. He said he'd seen her name bandied about a lot but wasn't sure if she wrote his sort of thing.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-09 01:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-09 04:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-09 11:03 pm (UTC)That said, having looked at all the Gollancz proofs I have sitting around, it is the only one not to mention the author's gender. Admittedly most of the others have non-gender-ambiguous names on them, but still.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-14 10:36 am (UTC)I think the word you should be using here is sex not gender.
Sex is biological. Gender is a societal construct. I think you're discussing the sex of these authors not their gender.