coalescent: (Default)
[personal profile] coalescent
[Poll #1046886]

Actual answer here. Vote before you click.

EDIT: See also [livejournal.com profile] jlassen's two entries, and Andrew Wheeler here.

FURTHER EDIT: Commentary from [livejournal.com profile] rosefox here and [livejournal.com profile] cristalia here.

Re: The real answer

Date: 2007-08-30 07:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cellardoor28.livejournal.com
But why should a woman be a token? Surely the authors involved would rather be on the cover because of their own merits rather than 'shit, we need to put a bird on the cover to get women readers'?

Re: The real answer

Date: 2007-08-30 03:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jamiam.livejournal.com
I guess it depends on whether or not the authors involved believe that the merits of an entire group of writers are being systematically overlooked (by publishers, in this case; editors and readers in others) because of unconscious biases and/or a long-standing cultural perception that SF is by men, for men. For example.

But this isn't actually about the authors' reaction to the cover: since this is purely a marketing consideration, the only reaction that matters is the readers'.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Profile

coalescent: (Default)
Niall

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jun. 29th, 2025 03:26 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
March 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2012