coalescent: (Default)
[personal profile] coalescent
Noodling around on Amazon, I stumble upon the paperback of Lydia Millet's Oh Pure and Radiant Heart. It does not say "nominated for the Arthur C. Clarke Award" on the cover; instead, the uncredited "synopsis" concludes:
"Oh Pure and Radiant Heart" is no more a SF novel than "The Time-Traveller's Wife". Instead, it is a powerful and original fiction of responsibility and guilt, today's America, and the peculiar terrors of our nuclear world.

However, customers who bought this item also bought Gradisil, Nova Swing, and Hav (and the paperback for the latter carries an Ursula le Guin blurb, which suggests they're not ignoring the sf market, at least). Ha.

Date: 2007-06-07 06:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] secritcrush.livejournal.com
Ignore my nonsensical commitude ... there is no one behind this curtain.

Date: 2007-06-07 06:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
Dammit! I was about to reply to that. :-)

Date: 2007-06-07 06:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] secritcrush.livejournal.com
In the like 15 seconds before I retracted? (You can comment on the general thought if you want - I started to write it up and then thought "hmmm I ought to be sure it the other is a romance/sf hybrid too and then accidentally posted when I meant to post to celia's blog because I was writing up another comment simultaneously.)

But I do stand by the thought that if you can appeal to a huge market or a small one (because the huge market will be offput by appeals to the large one the small market will read it anyway, you go for the big market - that's just sense.)

Date: 2007-06-07 06:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
Oh, absolutely. I just think that if you marketed Oh Pure and Radiant Heart to romance readers they might get a bit of a shock. :)

Date: 2007-06-07 06:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] secritcrush.livejournal.com
appeals to the small one, not large one and stick an and in there.

Date: 2007-06-07 06:48 pm (UTC)
ext_7025: (Default)
From: [identity profile] buymeaclue.livejournal.com
>"Oh Pure and Radiant Heart" is no more a SF novel than "The Time-Traveller's Wife".

So...it's an SF novel, then?

Date: 2007-06-07 06:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
Heh, quite. It did occur to me that the writer might be trying to be extremely clever and subtle, nudge-nudge wink-wink, rather than just irritating, but if so I think they missed.

Date: 2007-06-07 06:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] secritcrush.livejournal.com
the time traveller's wife is romance novel, thank you very much.

Date: 2007-06-07 06:59 pm (UTC)
ext_7025: (Default)
From: [identity profile] buymeaclue.livejournal.com
Stop trampling on my pith!

Date: 2007-06-07 07:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] secritcrush.livejournal.com
*skulks into a pithless corner*

Date: 2007-06-07 07:02 pm (UTC)
ext_7025: (why not?)
From: [identity profile] buymeaclue.livejournal.com
You want I should pith you?

Date: 2007-06-07 07:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
It's a dessert topping and a floor wax!

Date: 2007-06-07 06:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nuttyxander.livejournal.com
Can I go slightly on record as saying right now that if I were a publisher looking at our sales figures right now I'd want to class anything as Sci-Fi (or crime, or romance or any genre) rather than general or literary fiction.

Because the latter two are not growing areas in sales...

Date: 2007-06-07 06:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
Can I go slightly on record

How very accomplished of you.

Date: 2007-06-07 07:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nuttyxander.livejournal.com
Hey, I even visited stores today.

(my ongoing project to use fewer needless qualifiers needs some work)

Date: 2007-06-08 01:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] twic.myopenid.com (from livejournal.com)
Perhaps you could donate them to Graham? He seems to get through a lot.

-- tom

Date: 2007-06-11 10:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] grahamsleight.livejournal.com
I think some have said that, perhaps.

Date: 2007-06-07 08:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abigail-n.livejournal.com
While it's clearly ludicrous to argue that Oh Pure and Radiant Heart isn't SF, I think that, much like The Time Traveler's Wife and Never Let Me Go and just about every other work of outsider SF, it isn't successful as a genre work.

Unlike TTTW and NLMG, however, it is freaking awesome.

Date: 2007-06-07 08:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veggiesu.livejournal.com
Except that, of course, NLMG is indeed freaking awesome :-)

Date: 2007-06-07 10:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
I suspect that every single person reading this disagrees strongly with at least one of the value-judgements Abigail made in her comment ...

Date: 2007-06-07 10:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veggiesu.livejournal.com
Almost certainly :-) Although I'm probably in the minority over *which* of her value judgements I strongly disagree with :-p

Date: 2007-06-07 11:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bibliolicious.livejournal.com
I dunno. I think my co-blogger Vicky would agree.

Date: 2007-06-07 11:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pigeonhed.livejournal.com
I claim a hat-trick!

Date: 2007-06-08 08:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abigail-n.livejournal.com
Actually, I suspect there are more NLMG-lovers than TTTW-lovers or OP&RH-lovers in this thread.

Date: 2007-06-08 08:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
My guess would actually be that TTTW is more loved than NLMG is more loved than OP&RH; But clearly this calls for a poll.

Date: 2007-06-08 08:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abigail-n.livejournal.com
I'm surprised there aren't more people who disagree with all three.

Date: 2007-06-08 01:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] twic.myopenid.com (from livejournal.com)
I think she's entirely right.

-- tom

Date: 2007-06-08 01:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] twic.myopenid.com (from livejournal.com)
Although, to be fair, i'm not a single person.

-- tom

Date: 2007-06-11 08:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] i-ate-my-crusts.livejournal.com
Can I go with freaking noisome, instead? I hated OP&RH with a passion that burns hotter than a really hot thing.

*cough*

Date: 2007-06-07 11:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pigeonhed.livejournal.com
There is now a customer review which highlights the ACCA shortlisting.

Date: 2007-06-08 07:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ninebelow.livejournal.com
Wasn't this in Ansible two months ago? Slow, Harrison, slow.

Date: 2007-06-08 09:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] talvalin.livejournal.com
You're just bitter than he made the poll before you did.

Date: 2007-06-08 09:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ninebelow.livejournal.com
That poll didn't even exist when I wrote this!

Date: 2007-06-08 09:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] talvalin.livejournal.com
Two LJ blunders in as many days. This is what happens you read fragments of posts out of order.

Don't suppose I could swap you Vellum for Red Seas Under Red Skies?

Date: 2007-06-08 09:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
Given that I won't be giving him Red Seas until Mr H's gig, I'm guessing that'll be tricky.

Date: 2007-06-08 09:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] talvalin.livejournal.com
Oh. I thought he already had it. :(

Date: 2007-06-08 11:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ninebelow.livejournal.com
Do some bloody reviews yourself.

Date: 2007-06-08 11:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] talvalin.livejournal.com
Well, I asked Niall about The Dreaming Void...

I may have meant Ink when I said Vellum. I recall offering it before and you said something about not wanting to reread Vellum again (which you did lend me and I need to return).

How about End Of The World Blues?

Date: 2007-06-08 12:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ninebelow.livejournal.com
How about End Of The World Blues?

Pfft.

Have you got a paperback of Locke Lamora? I'll swap you that for the trade of it and lend you Red Skies at the same time.

Date: 2007-06-08 10:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ninebelow.livejournal.com
Don't suppose I could swap you Vellum for Red Seas Under Red Skies?

What does this mean? I have both. Or did I lend you Vellum?

Date: 2007-06-08 10:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
Wait, so I don't need to give you the Lynch after all? I'm confused.

Date: 2007-06-08 11:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ninebelow.livejournal.com
No, no I don't have it yet. I was just baffled by what Lal thought he was bringing to the table. Nothing, it would appear. Worst barterer ever.

By the way, Theft is hands down the book of the year.

Date: 2007-06-08 11:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
By the way, Theft is hands down the book of the year.

Not the book of last year? :-p

Date: 2007-06-08 12:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ninebelow.livejournal.com
Not the book of last year? :-p

In my world it was published on the 7th June 2007.

Date: 2007-06-08 12:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
I always forget you're on PST.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Profile

coalescent: (Default)
Niall

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jun. 27th, 2025 07:05 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
March 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2012