Tintin in Hollywood
May. 16th, 2007 10:08 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Yesterday brought the news that Steven Spielberg and Peter Jackson have teamed up to produce/direct a trilogy of Tintin films.
The question, of course, is which three it should be. Hence:
[Poll #985701]
The reasons for my own votes are, of course, obvious: The Secret of the Unicorn/Red Rackham's Treasure has PIRATES, Destination Moon/Explorers on the Moon has THA MOON, and Tintin in Tibet is just all around great.
(I hope this extended poll works. I consulted
ninebelow in matters of poll mojo, so if it doesn't work, blame him.)
EDIT (a) it worked! and (b) comment-spam of the day.
Spielberg and Jackson are said to have selected three adventures from the comic book series, but it is not yet known which ones they are.
The question, of course, is which three it should be. Hence:
[Poll #985701]
The reasons for my own votes are, of course, obvious: The Secret of the Unicorn/Red Rackham's Treasure has PIRATES, Destination Moon/Explorers on the Moon has THA MOON, and Tintin in Tibet is just all around great.
(I hope this extended poll works. I consulted
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
EDIT (a) it worked! and (b) comment-spam of the day.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 10:46 am (UTC)Actually, looking at that list, there appear to be more Tintin books than I thought that I've never read. I can't for the life of me remember The Black Island or Tintin in America, for instance. I wonder if there's a collected Tintin boxed set of some kind ...
no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 10:52 am (UTC)I have never read any Tintin, so I was just voting off what sounded like it might have exciting things in, like pirates and THA MOON and crabs.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 10:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 11:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 01:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 04:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-17 12:39 am (UTC)Well, except for one detail. I can't remember what it is, but i remember there being one thing that doesn't sit with the naturalistic reading.
-- tom
no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 01:07 pm (UTC)This sounds familiar. I think I may have read it.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 12:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 01:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 10:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 10:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 10:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 11:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 10:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 11:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 11:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 02:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 04:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 04:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 11:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 04:12 pm (UTC)