BSFA Awards: Last day for nominations
Jan. 13th, 2007 09:59 am[Poll #905941]
The current list of nominations is here; send your nominations to BSFA.Awards@gmail.com. As Ian says, just because something's on that list doesn't guarantee it's going to make it to the shortlist: it might have received one nomination, it might have received fifty. If the Hugo nomination stats are anything to go by, this is going to be especially true of the short fiction -- the nomination field tends to be broad but relatively shallow. So if you see a story -- or anything else you like -- already on the list, it's still worth adding your nomination.
The current list of nominations is here; send your nominations to BSFA.Awards@gmail.com. As Ian says, just because something's on that list doesn't guarantee it's going to make it to the shortlist: it might have received one nomination, it might have received fifty. If the Hugo nomination stats are anything to go by, this is going to be especially true of the short fiction -- the nomination field tends to be broad but relatively shallow. So if you see a story -- or anything else you like -- already on the list, it's still worth adding your nomination.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 10:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 10:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 12:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 01:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 01:46 pm (UTC)So, no.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 01:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 01:54 pm (UTC)The non-existent nepotist in me hasn't even nominated my best friend (Wendy Waring, Stone Sentinels, Interzone 207) for her eligible work because I haven't read the finished product.
Me, slack? Yes. I am a lost cause :P
no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 02:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 04:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 05:03 pm (UTC)Oh, wait, the site's back up. Never mind.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 05:15 pm (UTC)*goes to email*
no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 06:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 01:29 pm (UTC)And I'm sure I've said this before, but I personally think the "I haven't read enough recent fiction" line is a bit crap. You can tell if something is a very good book; if you think something is a very good book, I would say it deserves to be nominated.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 01:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 01:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 11:50 pm (UTC)I did nominate a non-fiction book, though.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 01:49 pm (UTC)I nominate where I feel I know the "market" enough to nominate the works which are both representative and good. I only nominate for Australian awards, for example, when I've read everything published. I find nominating for anything where I haven;t read everything problematic at best.
But I recognise I'm a bit idiosyncratic about this.
I really should just avoid these threads...
no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 10:35 am (UTC)Oh how you cut me to the quick!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 10:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 10:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 11:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 12:54 pm (UTC)On the other hand, being married to a previous BSFA Awards administrator, I am chuffed to bits that the interweb has enabled many more nominations to be received than was previously possible.
Hooray!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 12:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 01:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 12:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 01:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 04:52 pm (UTC)At the same time, I miss not being able to see the burgeoning spreadsheet of nominations right now! And then I remember the matching feeling of deep anxiety that some of the categories seemed to be heading for an enormous tie and a shortlist of multitudes.
Never mind the potential horror that the Wrong Things might be favoured by the majority. Hope I'm not making Ian depressed here, at all...
no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 05:10 pm (UTC)I'm considering just changing the damn rules next year.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 05:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 05:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 02:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 02:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 09:06 pm (UTC)That means, as far as I'm concerned, you get to nominate, but you might want to follow that up with the membership secretary at some point.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 08:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 03:33 pm (UTC)Come to think of it, I've a box of floppies somewhere with a bunch of old Matrixes in WP5.1 format.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 08:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 04:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 05:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 05:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 11:45 pm (UTC)(But I am laughing too hard to care! Good one, Graham.)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 08:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 06:40 pm (UTC)In short, my life is quite possibly a hollow sham.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 09:07 pm (UTC)Of course, if you were to somehow have nominated in the past before your membership expired, then all would be well, but short of time travel, I don't see how that's going to happen.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 09:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 09:26 pm (UTC)