Your Discussion Point For The Afternoon
Jan. 10th, 2007 03:49 pm"There's a Reason I'm not Dating a Nerd":
I later pondered and realized that what pissed me off was the notion that, because I’m female, I need to prove to men that I can join their exclusive club. And once that proof is established, I’m still not really allowed into their clubhouse. In the same way that so many nerds consider jocks to be practically another species, well, women are, too. We are Other. We’re confusing and mystifying. And it doesn’t matter if we like the same things, if we read the same things, if we discuss the same things. ‘Female’ is ‘Other’. But a female who is into those same things is put into yet another classification – as both female and nerd (especially if you’re attractive) you’re now a fetish. You’re someone who can share the joy of videogames and comics and science fiction, so he doesn’t have to alter his interests to impress you – and on top of that, you might have sex with him. You’re not just a girl, you’re a dream girl.
I used to be pretty pleased with that. I grew up awkward (as many nerds do) and when I first met a group of male nerds who treated me as Queen Nerd, it was a heady, thrilling feeling. But as I grew more comfortable and confident with myself, it started to feel creepier. I don’t like being someone’s concept, I like being a person. And Nerd Girl is not the same as Person.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 04:01 pm (UTC)Second, it is somewhat overstated.
THird, it is a bit confused [or at least the bit you've quoted is].
Having said that there seems to be truth in what she says about objectification, and manifestations thereof, in 'nerd' circles. And I don't see it as a big deal either. *shrug*
Every group has those who are not terribly good at empathy and commuication.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 04:07 pm (UTC)Quite honestly, I selfishly enjoy that dynamic because it works to my advantage...but I'm not dating a "nerd" either (though he has nerd sympathies).
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 04:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 04:15 pm (UTC)Hehe! Yes, probably.
I came out a nerd in that quiz...was quite insulted!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 04:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 04:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 04:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 04:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 04:40 pm (UTC)I did have something of an urge to rebut some of it, but it would just come down to 'the geeks I hang out with aren't like that', which isn't much more useful in its scope that what she has said.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 04:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 04:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 04:49 pm (UTC)Never quite understood what so wrong with finding a partner from among those you already know and like, myself.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 04:50 pm (UTC)What do you mean, apply pragmatism? Like, "Here be sex toy"?
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 04:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 05:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 05:08 pm (UTC)Female Conversation goes, Stroke, Reassurance, Admire, Undercut until a central person is established. It's mostly emotional grooming/
Male Conversation goes, Exchange of Information, More Information, The One with the Most Information/shiniest toy wins and then they all get on with sharing a drink.
Nerds tend to MC, so do Baseball fans. but the Nerds are assuming she understands the rules and so are shuffling the status pack, whereas her boyfriend doesn't think she's worth playing with.
I don't necessarily think she's wrong not wanting to play status games in a relationship, but I think her diagnosis--that they were trying to catch her out--is wrong.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 05:09 pm (UTC)Erm...and this differs how from any host of identities people try on and keep, or are forced to keep?
Really, Nerd Girl is as reductionist and dehumanising as Jock or Beauty Queen.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 05:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 05:18 pm (UTC)I'm sure
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 05:19 pm (UTC)But of course. You get a better class of geek around these parts.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 05:20 pm (UTC)... wait a minute.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 05:28 pm (UTC)I agree with you in general, but reading her entire post, the geek boy reaction at the bookstore seems a little strong even for that - "Name three robins!" I mean, really?
Yeah, when you first meet someone who claims ingroup status there's some testing, but even amongst geek/nerd clans I've always found it to be a little more subtle than that.
Although taking just that one guy as a sample of all geekdom is painting with a broad brush, I'll admit.
But there's a dynamic difference between people peacocking when they first meet ("Look at my shininess!") and one of them declaring themselves arbiters of ingroupness.