coalescent: (Default)
[personal profile] coalescent
A little while ago I mentioned Simon Ings' new novel, The Weight of Numbers. I also linked to this Guardian review, which seemed to do a pretty good job of putting the book in context. Now I notice all the reviews on Ings' webpage, and in particular this review from The Independent, which is on a whole other level:
Science fiction: which way to the exit? The history of SF over the past half-century has been a balancing act. On one side is its adolescent drive to create slam-bang adventure stories set against the most exotic backdrops; on the other, its adult imperative to extrapolate the impact of social change and new technology on culture, politics and the wider society.

Plenty of authors still guard the hardcore turf, but many others have made common cause with literary fiction. Novels like David Mitchell's Cloud Atlas make the Man Booker shortlist despite occupying territory which would have been indisputably considered SF even a short while ago.
Discuss.

It's also weird--in a good way--to see a review that recognises and engages with the context of the book appear in the pages of The Independent rather than, say, Foundation. Though I wish Murray had gone into more detail (or had had the space to go into more detail) about why he thought it didn't work. "The plot works but the story doesn't" is an interestingly loaded turn of phrase.

(I would like to see lots of discussion of this book, so everyone should go and read it now, please. And as it happens, a review of the book by Abigail Nussbaum will be appearing at Strange Horizons next week.)

In a not-entirely-dissimilar vein, this discussion of reactions to Never Let Me Go may be of interest to some.

Date: 2006-05-08 04:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] talvalin.livejournal.com
I've been adding books to LibraryThing finally, and my unread tag count is 668. Shit.

http://www.librarything.com/profile/Talvalin

Date: 2006-05-08 04:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-susumu64.livejournal.com
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST, LAL.

Date: 2006-05-08 05:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snowking.livejournal.com
Well, suddenly I feel a lot better about my unread shelves.

Date: 2006-05-08 05:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ajr.livejournal.com
If I tagged everything I hadn't read, I'd have an unread tag count of far, far more than that. Instead I've been tagging books I've read.

Date: 2006-05-08 06:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nuttyxander.livejournal.com
Whereas I've completely fallen off the scanning into librarything waggon.
My unread count will remain high until I get down to the charity shop.

Date: 2006-05-09 08:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] talvalin.livejournal.com
Somehow it is reassuring to know that it's not just me. How did you end up with so many unread books, and when did it start getting seriously bad?

Date: 2006-05-09 04:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ajr.livejournal.com
In a nutshell, indiscriminate buying from charity shops.

It was bad when I was just doing it with science fiction, it got very bad when I discovered that contempory fiction is good too, and it went into total freefall when I started working at a charity shop.

I understand that normal people, if they're interested in a book, wait to buy it until they'll be able to read it. Me? I'll just buy it anyway, even though I know it'll be years before I get around to it. Me am genius, clearly.

Date: 2006-05-08 06:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mattia.livejournal.com
...

I don't think I even own 668 books (I'm talking fiction here).

Date: 2006-05-08 07:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
Lal appears to be sixth overall. Frankly, I think he's not even trying.

Date: 2006-05-08 08:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ajr.livejournal.com
I suspect that if I tagged my unread books, I'd easily jump up to third place. I think I'll stick to just tagging books that I've read, though.

Date: 2006-05-09 08:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] talvalin.livejournal.com
Join us!

Date: 2006-05-08 09:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] secritcrush.livejournal.com
I dunno - I find it kinda hot.

Date: 2006-05-09 03:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ninebelow.livejournal.com
Is there anything you don't?

According to Library Thing Graham is my best match. I hear hearts breaking all over this journal.

Date: 2006-05-09 03:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] secritcrush.livejournal.com
Having lots of books IS hot. Not reading them is wrong, so therefore hot in a perverse way. It's all sensible.

*snerk*

Date: 2006-05-09 03:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] secritcrush.livejournal.com
Also, don't find you hot. :P

Date: 2006-05-09 09:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] secritcrush.livejournal.com
Sheesh. You didn't even bother to use my favorite icon. No wonder you are not hot.

Date: 2006-05-09 06:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] grahamsleight.livejournal.com
Hang on...I just signed up to LibraryThing yesterday, and put on about a dozen books from my reference shelf - and I thought my listing was private. Evidently not, and evidently the Chicago Manual of Style plays a very big part in your life...

Date: 2006-05-09 06:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ninebelow.livejournal.com
I just signed up to LibraryThing yesterday, and put on about a dozen books from my reference shelf

It just so happens I did the same thing.

Date: 2006-05-09 08:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] talvalin.livejournal.com
:P

I've got more books at my sister's house that I haven't added yet, primarily a big box of non-fiction but that's a hundred at most. I reckon I can get into fourth or perhaps even third place, but getting beyond that would require more physical space for storage than I currently have access to.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Profile

coalescent: (Default)
Niall

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jul. 12th, 2025 04:52 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
March 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2012