Marginalia
Dec. 28th, 2005 02:34 pmThings I should have linked to ages ago:
A logarithmic map of the universe. (Root page here, but it seems to do weird things to Safari.)
A conversation with Joe Hill (author of the rather good 20th Century Ghosts) at the Mumpsimus.
Battlestar Galactica season two deleted scenes.
Nattering on:
The Top Blog Posts of 2005, allegedly. Number one is a livejournal post I missed completely.
The editors of the American Journal of Bioethics on the fabrication of stem cell data by Hwang Woo-suk,
And now I should go and do some useful things with my afternoon.
A logarithmic map of the universe. (Root page here, but it seems to do weird things to Safari.)
A conversation with Joe Hill (author of the rather good 20th Century Ghosts) at the Mumpsimus.
Battlestar Galactica season two deleted scenes.
Nattering on:
"If a writer insists on (or is obsessed by) returning to the same themes and forms"? Well, now, in my reading of Shakespeare, of Dickens, the Romantic poets, Hawthorne, James, Thomas Hardy, Hemingway, Faulkner, T.S. Eliot, Yeats--actually of almost all serious writers still worth reading, I seem to find constant return to "the same themes and forms." Am I supposed to have grown "irritated"? Silly me. I just assumed that this was the mark of poets and novelists "obsessed" with the subjects that most interested them, that most strongly provoked their own powers of invention and led them to invest their "forms" with both imagination and authenticity. If I had only known they were just nattering on.An excerpt (admittedly in a horrible font) from Ian R. Macleod's next novel, Song of Time.
The Top Blog Posts of 2005, allegedly. Number one is a livejournal post I missed completely.
The editors of the American Journal of Bioethics on the fabrication of stem cell data by Hwang Woo-suk,
And now I should go and do some useful things with my afternoon.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-28 02:39 pm (UTC)Watch Veronica Mars?
no subject
Date: 2005-12-28 02:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-28 02:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-28 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-28 05:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-28 05:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-28 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-28 07:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-29 05:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-28 05:33 pm (UTC)(I assume you thought I was Liz?)
no subject
Date: 2005-12-28 06:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-28 07:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-28 02:55 pm (UTC)I like this a lot because I never pick up on big blog stuff going on so it's very handy.
Number four is making me laugh a lot. I am mean.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-28 05:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-28 05:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-28 05:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-28 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-28 06:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-28 06:23 pm (UTC)*clears space at lunch table just incase*
no subject
Date: 2005-12-28 06:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-28 10:07 pm (UTC)Sit at the lunch table with Niall and I, today we are wearing pink :D
no subject
Date: 2005-12-28 10:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-28 10:10 pm (UTC)ROMG
no subject
Date: 2005-12-28 10:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-28 10:18 pm (UTC)(and hee. I totally was wearing pink, well socks.)
no subject
Date: 2005-12-28 05:08 pm (UTC)Cool...
no subject
Date: 2005-12-28 06:27 pm (UTC)Meh.