coalescent: (Default)
[personal profile] coalescent
Previous discussion around these parts suggested that, although the umbrella motion to grant extended eligibility for works not published in the US in 2004 failed, Margo Lanagan's collection Black Juice was awarded extended eligibility in a separate motion. This turns out to be not quite right; Cheryl Morgan has kindly forwarded me the relevant section from the minutes of the business meeting.
Moved, To extend for one year the eligibility of "Singing My Sister Down" by Margo Lanagan, a short story published in the collection, Black Juice, Allen & Unwin, Australia 2004 based on limited availability, as authorised by Section 3.4. This short story was also published in the US in January 2005.
So, only that one story is eligible for next year's Hugos, not the whole collection. There's a pragmatic advantage to this, in that it eliminates any potential disagreements about which story from the collection to nominate, and 'Singing My Sister Down' would certainly make a worthy nominee; but it still seems a bit of a shame, and slightly odd.

Date: 2005-08-29 11:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chance88088.livejournal.com
I think it's much more likely to get on the ballot this way, even if it wouldn't have been my choice of the collection.

But! new story in the British version also going to be eligible.

Date: 2005-08-29 11:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
Ah, but that edition's not published until next February ...

Date: 2005-08-29 11:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chance88088.livejournal.com
Ah, boo - I thought November for some reason.

Date: 2005-08-29 12:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fjm.livejournal.com
I explained this to you at the time. If there was a category for best collection, we'd have gone for an extension for the lot. As there wasn't, it made sense to pick one story for the ballot and get people to rally round it. Although people suggested other stories, Singing My Sister Down was easily the most popular.

Date: 2005-08-29 12:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
I think I misunderstood you -- I thought the motion was for the whole collection, and then we were going to rally round one particular story. And the comments I linked to in the post above confused me further ...

Date: 2005-08-29 12:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] benpeek.livejournal.com
sounds like a bit of odd favouritism. strange things, awards.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Profile

coalescent: (Default)
Niall

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jul. 21st, 2025 06:07 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
March 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2012