Christopher Eccleston is fantastic. A lot of the dialogue was sharp. The rest ... well, it wasn't all actively shit. Some of it was just meh. The direction was pedestrian, the effects just weren't up to scratch, and the music was dire.
There's potential, and next week's does look better, but at the moment it really wouldn't bother me much if I missed the rest of the series.
But everyone else liked it.
There's potential, and next week's does look better, but at the moment it really wouldn't bother me much if I missed the rest of the series.
But everyone else liked it.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-26 08:07 pm (UTC)WRONGHEAD!
Date: 2005-03-26 08:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-26 08:11 pm (UTC)Does it pass the Buffy epsiode one standard?
Yes!
no subject
Date: 2005-03-27 09:50 am (UTC)And I'm no fan of Welcome, but I like it more than this. It feels, you know, vaguely competent most of the time. Still, you're right that many shows improve dramatically from pilot. Here's hoping.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-27 11:51 am (UTC)It's like the bad bits of late '90's Doctor Who, only this time partly redeemed by being set in the context of a much more professional and effective package - one that recalls much better eras of the show.
What the first episode did do very well, I thought, was generate a series of fairly iconic scenes and images that are going to stick with younger viewers for years. I would never argue that Doctor Who is purely a kids show, but that's clearly a significant part of its genetic make-up. I imagine a lot of today's kids are going to be participating in "I remember 2005" shows in 15 years time, and talking nostalgically about plastic arms attacking the Doctor, Wheelie Bins eating people, big vats of plastic, photos of the Doctor through history, and that scene where the Doctor talks about who he is.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Not Actively Shit
Date: 2005-03-26 08:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-26 08:19 pm (UTC)I was particularly impressed with the role Graham Norton played.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-26 08:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-26 08:23 pm (UTC)Graham Norton
From:Re: Graham Norton
From:Re: Graham Norton
From:Re: Graham Norton
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-26 08:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-26 08:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-26 08:45 pm (UTC)Having said that, it looked pretty, and I'm pleased that the story and setting seem to be a complete departure from this week's episode.
Clearly you have not watched enough Teletubbies
Date: 2005-03-26 09:13 pm (UTC)Re: Clearly you have not watched enough Teletubbies
Date: 2005-03-27 07:39 am (UTC)wonder if nu-nu will be the new K-9
no subject
Date: 2005-03-28 06:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-26 08:24 pm (UTC)In comparison to what? They were as good or better than anything I've seen on TV in recent years.
I thought it was a very good pseudo-pilot and the best is yet to come.
I'm sure you just do this to wind people up y'know...
no subject
Date: 2005-03-26 08:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-26 08:42 pm (UTC)A firm thumbs up from me. I can't decide whether taken as a whole it was just *slightly* the wrong side of 'camp', but it's nothing that can't settle down. The flaws were mainly the occasionally embarrassing "humourous" moments and the OTT incidental music.
Will the Youth of Today like it? Who the hell knows!
Explosion
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-03-26 10:51 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-26 11:53 pm (UTC)I liked some of the writing, but they were trying for ambitious visuals and failing. Why not concentrate on the characters?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-26 08:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-28 06:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-27 07:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-27 11:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-28 04:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-28 06:41 pm (UTC)*sigh*
Sometimes hott men are wasted on the young...
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: