Century Rain
Dec. 13th, 2004 09:34 am
There are many things I should have done over the weekend. Instead of most of them, I read Alastair Reynolds' latest novel.For all that he's the winner of the 'British Science Fiction Award' (it says so on the cover, so it must be true), this is my first encounter with novel-length Reynolds. I had a bad experience with a short story, 'Galactic North', that appeared in Interzone a few years ago, and for a while actively avoided his work; then I picked up a copy of the Infinities anthology, which contained his novella 'Diamond Dogs', which I enjoyed greatly. Since then, I've had vague plans to read more of his work, but never got much beyond his other short stories. Part of this is a slight reluctance to commit myself to four linked books (even though people have assured me that Chasm City can be read solo). Century Rain, on the other hand, is a genuine standalone, with no connection to the Inhibitors universe.
It also has one of those twin-strand narratives that seem to be so trendy these days. In the future--2266--Earth has been devastated by an irresponsible release of nanotechnology, and all surviving humans live in space or on other planets. The Threshers occupy Tanglewood, a mess of habitats in near-Earth orbit, and are cautious to the point of technophobia. By contrast the Slashers (no smirking at the back, there) argue that one mistake is no reason to swear off the advantages that nanotech has to offer, and have embraced the stuff wholeheartedly. Tensions are running high. The Slashers are in favour of using any means necessary to rehabilitate Earth, up to and including absurdly large scale engineering projects, such as accelerating continental drift to sweep any contaminated bits of crust down into the mantle; The Threshers, unsurprisingly, aren't convinced.
Verity Auger is a Thresher archaeologist, trying to reconstruct a picture of pre-nanocaust Earth. One day a mysterious map falls into her lap; it purports to be from 1959, but its condition seems far too good for that to be true. And there's something slightly not-quite-right about it, as well ...
The other strand, obviously, is set in 1959. Wendell Floyd and Andre Custine are struggling jazz musicians, or possibly struggling private detectives. It's a past, but not our past, however. Their Europe is one where the German invasion of France failed almost before it had begun; where World War II and most of the associated technological development never happened; and where Paris is moody and murky, with fascism lurking in the shadows, and glamorous-yet-tragic dames on street corners:
She stepped out into the twilight air, thin and angular in black, like a sketch in Vogue. She wore a black fur stole and a black pillbox hat with a spotted veil, and when she stood under the lamplight she looked like a million dollars, until she was near him, and then she looked tired and sad and on the edge of something she couldn't face.
"Let's go eat," Floyd said gently. "And then let's go hear some real music." (p.148)
I think Reynolds had a lot of fun playing up the noir aspects of this strand. It feels, oddly, a little more staged, a little less 'real', than the future-strand; but given the way the two link up, I think that's deliberate, and mostly it worked for me.
It's a bit of a shame, then, that the use of Paris in the larger narrative didn't work so well. I like the idea of E2, but from about the novel's half-way point it becomes clear that Floyd's story is going to be subsumed into Verity's--his 1959, his world, all of it, is reduced to being another prize in the ongoing conflict between the Threshers and the Slashers. The story moves away from Paris and, quite apart from the fact that this involves leaving the most interesting location in the book, to my mind it leads to a couple of frustrating structural weaknesses.
Firstly, Verity suddenly has to become Chief Expert, infodumping shamelessly to bring Floyd up to date on her time, and presenting as certainty some things that she herself had seemed to be uncertain about earlier in the book. Secondly, most of the final hundred and fifty pages is given over to an unnaturally prolonged, and eventually slightly dull, chase scene. The very end, when it comes, is pitched exactly right, but on the way there were some moments where I was worried about losing interest--exactly when I shouldn't have been able to put the book down.
There are compensations. Thematically, it all works quite nicely. The novel's points about responsible use of technology aren't new, but there's a nice point-counterpoint going on on multiple levels; and watching traditional noir-detective Floyd and kick-ass sf heroine Auger bounce off each other is very entertaining. There are many interesting throwaway and not-so-throwaway details to Verity's world, from 'Asimov-compliant' robots to the deployment of an amusica virus as a weapon, to the portrayal of the something-more-than-human Slashers and their abilities.
The novel's back cover is smothered in quotes praising Reynolds' previous novels. No fewer than three of these describe his work as 'mind-boggling'. Century Rain isn't mind-boggling. It's smart, highly readable, a lot of fun (and funny at times, which I wasn't really expecting), and for much of its length it's a good old-fashioned mystery; but in the end, it's just not quite as good as I was hoping it would be.
Still, it's made me bump Chasm City a few more notches up my to-be-read list.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-13 01:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-13 02:03 am (UTC)I cleaned one room in my flat. I guess that's something.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-13 02:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-13 02:13 am (UTC)Chasm City is definitely worth reading, and probably the strongest of the quartet. It also helps that it's set prior to Redemption Ark, chronologically, despite being written (or published) later...
Set prior to <i>Redemption Ark</i>...?
Date: 2004-12-13 02:30 am (UTC)I'm not going to attempt to track through the various time strands of the four novels, but Chasm City was in any case the second one published; it came out in 2001.
Re: Set prior to <i>Redemption Ark</i>...?
Date: 2004-12-13 02:35 am (UTC)Re: Set prior to <i>Redemption Ark</i>...?
Date: 2004-12-13 02:45 am (UTC)Revelation Space
Chasm City
Redemption Ark
Absolution Gap
*nods*
no subject
Date: 2004-12-13 02:13 am (UTC)At this point, I mostly think it would just be an interesting novelty. :)
no subject
Date: 2004-12-13 01:59 am (UTC)You are making it sound like the story threw up in your pot-plant and wiped its face on the curtains. :-)
no subject
Date: 2004-12-13 02:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-13 02:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-13 02:21 am (UTC)Hmm, I wouldn't say mind-boggling but Revelation Space and Chasm City are good. Enjoyment dulled slightly once I'd read Schismatrix, mind. I really should get Absolution Gap.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-13 02:24 am (UTC)Thanks.
Hmm, I wouldn't say mind-boggling but Revelation Space and Chasm City are good. Enjoyment dulled slightly once I'd read Schismatrix, mind. I really should get Absolution Gap.
I think the premise of Century Rain could form the basis for a mind-boggling book (think Dick), but I don't think that's the sort of book Reynolds wanted to write. I was just amused that so many people had been boggled. :)
no subject
Date: 2004-12-13 03:24 am (UTC)Century Rain is at least reasonably consistent, unlike the majority of his novels, but I did think that it could have been better. I agree that the Paris segment was the most interesting and abandoning it so early was a mistake. I wasn't particular surprised by the shameless infodumping, but Floyd's reaction to all of it was brilliant, especially the line about being able to change a spark-plug. The dialogue was sharper than I've seen (it's dark, but still less grim than the Inhibitor stuff) and I laughed out loud in quite a few places, usually in public places. By the way, if you think the info-dumping in Century Rain was bad, try the entire chapter's worth of it at the end of Revelation Space!
Not that you need another person bugging you, but Chasm City is rather good. :)
no subject
Date: 2004-12-13 05:58 am (UTC)Well, I know what I'm nominating for next month's book group, then! I've been meaning to give it another go.
Floyd's reaction to all of it was brilliant, especially the line about being able to change a spark-plug. The dialogue was sharper than I've seen
Agreed, the dialogue was pretty sharp. I wish I'd noted down some of the better quotes, actually. :)
no subject
Date: 2005-02-15 10:00 pm (UTC)I don't think it was exactly quotable, what it had was a snap, some rythmn and verve. Yeah, that was one of the nice parts of the book.
Absolution Gap
Date: 2004-12-13 03:39 am (UTC)Re: Absolution Gap
Date: 2004-12-13 06:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-13 04:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-13 04:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-13 05:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-13 09:30 am (UTC)I won't bother. Just read the two pages epilogue, the rest isn't worth the effort.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-13 03:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-13 05:57 am (UTC)I did get that from The Algebraist, but although I think Century Rain is the better of the two books, it didn't give me a comparable buzz. There was cool stuff, but not as high a density of cool stuff. :)