Marginalia

Sep. 16th, 2004 10:52 am
coalescent: (Default)
[personal profile] coalescent
Hmm. The summary of this article is 'With a slew of fantasy novelists now landing huge deals, their genre has become publishing's hottest property. But, warns Nicholas Clee, look what happened to chick-lit.' Fair enough (and does anyone want to put money on proper science fiction being a boom category soon? I'm tempted), but on reading the article, it's not actually about fantasy novelists--Susanna Clarke isn't mentioned, for instance--it's about children's fantasy, as though that were all the fantasy there is. Sigh. Elsewhere, looks like Harry Potter isn't translating into increased children's reading after all. Double sigh. [Both via [livejournal.com profile] book2book]

Carnivale has picked up a bunch of minor Emmy awards: cinematography, art direction, costumes, hairstyling and (obvious one, this) best title sequence. Really, it's worth tuning in one week (FX289, Sundays, 9pm, people!) just to see the credits. They are a thing of beauty.

People can live without dreams. [via [livejournal.com profile] nature_science]

Computer viruses transmitted as images. The actual headline--'Software bug raises spectre of 'JPEG of death''--makes it sound much more like a Basilisk than it actually is. [via [livejournal.com profile] futurismic]

Short story distributed by text message. [via [livejournal.com profile] geekpress. I think]

Various science fiction writers discuss the social future, with particular emphasis on global issues and government. Asked whether the latter is possible and desirable, Pat Murphy said no and no, and Kim Stanley Robinson said yes and yes. [Locus]

Date: 2004-09-16 03:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snowking.livejournal.com
Elsewhere, looks like Harry Potter isn't translating into increased children's reading after all.

A fantastically wild claim there, Niall, since 1) There isn't a previous study to comp-are too and 2) it found 83% of young people read books in their spare time.

Date: 2004-09-16 03:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] colours.livejournal.com
it found 83% of young people read books in their spare time

I do think that's rather too impressive to be honest. We should be a little wary of the fact that this was a self-completion survey, and I'm sure there was some bias of people telling the researchers what they thought they wanted to hear.

Date: 2004-09-16 03:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snowking.livejournal.com
But if statisics are untrue then we have nothing! NOTHING! *SOB*

Date: 2004-09-16 03:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] colours.livejournal.com
or they could, y'know, use better survey methods... (shock! horror!)

Date: 2004-09-16 03:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snowking.livejournal.com
When we have a full surveillance scoiety, statistics are going to RAWK the HIZZAY!

Date: 2004-09-16 03:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ang-grrr.livejournal.com
WAAH.

You taunt me with your FX289.

Date: 2004-09-16 03:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snowking.livejournal.com
Me? Niall? Neither of us have SPACE TELLY. We used Channel ADSL.

Date: 2004-09-16 03:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ang-grrr.livejournal.com
That p was supposed to be an o.

I guess my touch typing aint as good as I think.

Date: 2004-09-16 03:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snowking.livejournal.com
Fair enough. Do you do R1 DVDs? Not til December and not exactly cheap but it'll probably be doomsday before it's on terrestrial or the like.

Note sure Episodic Previews and Re-caps cab be called a special feature though.

Date: 2004-09-16 04:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ang-grrr.livejournal.com
Wha' region are we in then? I watch DVDs on my playstation 2

*watches as Hoggy clutches his heart in shock*

S'okay. I'm hoping my Sky-enabled Brian comes through with the goods.

Date: 2004-09-16 04:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snowking.livejournal.com
*watches as Hoggy clutches his heart in shock*

Yeah, them PS2s are noisy fuckers for DVD watching.

The world is divided into regions for DVDs. Theoretically, you can't play a DVD from one with a DVD player from another thus keeping prices artificially inflated. Europe (along with Japan, South Africa and the Middle East) is in region 2. Region 1 is the US & Canada. I do believe there are some discs that will unlock PS2s to play other region's DVDs but I'm not sure.

Date: 2004-09-16 04:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] talvalin.livejournal.com
IIRC, Japanese Region 2 DVDs are not compatible with European Region 2 DVD players. I haven't been able to test this out as my DVD player is multi-region. Not that I know why this case might be.

Date: 2004-09-16 05:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ajr.livejournal.com
Japanese DVDs are R2 NTSC, so they should be perfectly compatible with European R2 players. Problems should only arrive if the TV being used can't handle NTSC.

Date: 2004-09-16 05:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snowking.livejournal.com
Oh, that's it. Beat me to the punch and do it better. HATE!

Date: 2004-09-16 05:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snowking.livejournal.com
That would be the NTSC/PAL thing I should think and if your DVD player and/or telly (one of them or both, I can never remember which) can handle it think they'll work.

Date: 2004-09-16 05:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ajr.livejournal.com
There's an Action Replay disc which lets you watch R1 DVDs on the PS2, my brother has one. It works, but I prefer using a proper DVD player over the PS2 any day.

Date: 2004-09-16 04:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
I, too, used to watch DVDs on Playstation. When I got sufficiently annoyed with (a) its inability to play other-region DVDs, and (b) its inability to play MPEGs and the like, I bought a cheap proper player.

It is much quieter. Most of the time.

Date: 2004-09-16 04:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
Er, what? It was a previous study that came up with the 83% figure. This (non-scientific) study found that half read for less than two hours per week, and one in ten hasn't read a book in the last month. Note that the two surveys aren't contradictory--83% may read in their spare time, but not much of their spare time.

It's not a great article, and these almost certainly aren't statistically significant results. I was being melodramatic, mostly because everyone goes on about how great it is that Harry Potter has gotten kids reading again, without any evidence to support that fact.

And then it goes into the non-fiction bit, and confuses the issue further.

Date: 2004-09-16 05:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snowking.livejournal.com
Yes, the article says it was a previous report but the ACTUAL report states it found 83% of the adorable ragamuffins read in their spare time. I'm going with the report rather than the Indy.

Date: 2004-09-16 05:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
So it does. Well spotted, that dude. In fact, the whole report is actually pretty positive. Bad Grauniad; no biscuit for them, today. But damn, I may have to rethink my Potter-effect skepticism.

Date: 2004-09-16 03:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] truecatachresis.livejournal.com
From that article on reading I noticed this:

Some worry that steering clear of non-fiction may effect the development of a child's imagination

I seriously doubt the author meant that. And if they did, then they really should not be complaining about children not reading non-fiction. It would appear that some adults could do with reading more non-fiction, especially if they write the bloody stuff for a living.

Date: 2004-09-16 03:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] truecatachresis.livejournal.com
Email sent to the editor of Guardian Unlimited Books:

From the article at this URL: http://books.guardian.co.uk/news/articles/0,6109,1305205,00.html , written by Anne Casselman, I noticed the following sentence.

Some worry that steering clear of non-fiction may effect the development of a child's imagination, even going so far as to impact their future career choices.

I have serious doubts that Anne intended to use effect instead of affect; it completely changes the meaning of the sentence, and undermines the entire thrust of the article. I find it doubly ironic that in an article challenging the literary abilities of children, someone employed to use language as their primary work tool can make such a juvenile error.

I would expect better of a professional writer; perhaps it is time for your staff to read more non-fiction instead of berating the youth of today?

Date: 2004-09-16 03:44 am (UTC)
ext_36172: (Default)
From: [identity profile] fba.livejournal.com
Stupid channel for it to be on - I completely forgot to watch it last week. If they have done two episodes again I don't have a hope in hell of figuring out what is going on (as the first episodes left me deeply confused.....). I guess it is possible that they are doing what SF did with Firefly and show the previous week's episode before the new episode.....

Date: 2004-09-16 04:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
Worst comes to the worst, I'll post you my set of magic CDs. Or the DVDs are due in December, I believe. :)

Date: 2004-09-16 04:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] colours.livejournal.com
it's about children's fantasy, as though that were all the fantasy there is. Sigh.

'The Independent' is crap. It's official. I don't know why people read it.

Date: 2004-09-16 04:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] danmilburn.livejournal.com
Because it's less crap than most of the other papers?

Date: 2004-09-16 04:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
I'm quite partial to it, although I think its news is often much better than its comment.

In this case, it's not as though the fantasy=children's conflation doesn't crop up anywhere else, after all.

Date: 2004-09-16 04:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] colours.livejournal.com
it's good for entertainment value. I used to have great fun finding the grammar mistakes on the front page.

/geek

Sci-Fi and the social future...

Date: 2004-09-16 12:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] applez.livejournal.com
Interesting read...

Interesting too to see the general concurrence on environmental and climate change challenges. I'm a little surprised that there was a tighter connection between climate change and 'crony-capitalism.'

Seems to me that if things continue as they are, it would be rational to conclude that climate change will lead to the ultimate discreditment of the current capitalist system ... leading to forms of governmental autocracy (emergency powers), or resurgent populist capitalism perhaps. In either case, the discreditment of the current capitalist state will produce a vaccuum that will force a social response.

Date: 2004-09-17 06:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scribeoflight.livejournal.com
Various science fiction writers discuss the social future, with particular emphasis on global issues and government. Asked whether the latter is possible and desirable, Pat Murphy said no and no, and Kim Stanley Robinson said yes and yes.


How can "government" not be possible or desirable?? Who is this Pat Murphy?

I will read the article when less sleepy, but please summarise if you get a moment...

To dream

Date: 2004-09-18 01:50 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Hmph. I am far from convinced. The paper demonstrates that the patient doesn't remember dreaming; that doesn't mean she didn't dream.

The paper's the usual over-jargonised neuropsychology claptrap, but it does have one superb passage, where, for no apparent reason, they describe one of her dreams:

The third night after the stroke, the patient reported a peculiar, short but very vivid dream. "An unknown person shows me a huge piece of cotton, with lots of very colorfully dressed little men depicted on it. These dwarf-like figures are in different postures: some of them lie down; others sit or stand up. Later, the same person shows me a second, even larger piece of cotton with hundreds of little men on it. I am to find the group of men first shown but I do not succeed and I am upset." After this episode, the patient stopped dreaming.


You just don't get that in cell biology papers.

-- tom

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Profile

coalescent: (Default)
Niall

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jan. 21st, 2026 06:56 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
March 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2012