Marginalia
Sep. 10th, 2004 11:04 amStrange Horizons has an interview with Zoran Zivkovic. He's got a long novellette called 'Compartments' in the next issue of Postscripts, and most of the stories that appeared in Interzone are due to be collected by Nightshade books as Impossible Stories. And if the third issue of Argosy ever appears, he's got a story in that, too: 'The Telephone'.
There's a piece at Sci-Fi Weekly arguing that SF TV isn't dead, it's just resting, seemingly largely based on the success of The 4400.
I wish the blog at Ready Steady Book had an RSS feed.
John Clute's review of Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell questions Neil Gaiman's blurb: 'We do, all the same, have to start with what he does actually say, which is that Strange is "unquestionably the finest English novel of the fantastic written in the last 70 years." To which one's immediate response is: bollocks.' Overall a positive review, however, and one that (as you would expect) cuts through the hype.
Love at first sight is real after all. Apparently.
But diaries may be bad for you. Or at least, people who keep diaries are more likely to suffer from headaches, sleeplessness and other such problems. 'Duncan speculates that diarists buck the usual trend because instead of a single, cathartic outpouring to offload trauma, diarists continually churn over their misfortunes and so never get over them. 'It's probably better not to get caught in a ruminative, repetitive cycle," she says.' And of course, that never happens on livejournal ...
Detailed vote results for the Hugos and retro Hugos. It's interesting to see what placed second in some categories--'The Message' nearly beat out Gollum to that Best Short Form Dramatic Presentation award, for instance.
The new Interzone should be going in the post soon, and has even been mentioned on BBC Cult. I'm thinking I'll take a break from my Shepard marathon when it turns up.
And Jeremy Hardy is a comedy genius. That is all. EDIT: I was referring to the show, not the webpage. Click the listen again link. :-p
There's a piece at Sci-Fi Weekly arguing that SF TV isn't dead, it's just resting, seemingly largely based on the success of The 4400.
I wish the blog at Ready Steady Book had an RSS feed.
John Clute's review of Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell questions Neil Gaiman's blurb: 'We do, all the same, have to start with what he does actually say, which is that Strange is "unquestionably the finest English novel of the fantastic written in the last 70 years." To which one's immediate response is: bollocks.' Overall a positive review, however, and one that (as you would expect) cuts through the hype.
Love at first sight is real after all. Apparently.
But diaries may be bad for you. Or at least, people who keep diaries are more likely to suffer from headaches, sleeplessness and other such problems. 'Duncan speculates that diarists buck the usual trend because instead of a single, cathartic outpouring to offload trauma, diarists continually churn over their misfortunes and so never get over them. 'It's probably better not to get caught in a ruminative, repetitive cycle," she says.' And of course, that never happens on livejournal ...
Detailed vote results for the Hugos and retro Hugos. It's interesting to see what placed second in some categories--'The Message' nearly beat out Gollum to that Best Short Form Dramatic Presentation award, for instance.
The new Interzone should be going in the post soon, and has even been mentioned on BBC Cult. I'm thinking I'll take a break from my Shepard marathon when it turns up.
And Jeremy Hardy is a comedy genius. That is all. EDIT: I was referring to the show, not the webpage. Click the listen again link. :-p
no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 03:12 am (UTC)It's been a while, hasn't it?
no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 03:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 03:13 am (UTC)Asimov's should go in the post today.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 03:16 am (UTC)I don't know. We should find them and smack them upside the head.
Asimov's should go in the post today.
Dude! I wasn't actually serious about that. You da man!
Also, fanboy moment: Micky Dupree was at Worldcon. I wonder if she's going to make it to Interaction...?
no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 03:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 03:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 04:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 04:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 03:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 03:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 03:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 03:47 am (UTC)Maybe, but it still leaves the problem of two people not knowing how the other feels. And that's always the basis for extended periods of longing after someone, isn't it? The hoping-that-they-feel-the-same-way thing. Or maybe that's just me. If one or both of you is shy then that would seem to create the time issue.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 03:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 04:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2004-09-10 07:01 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 03:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 04:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 04:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Kabuki
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 07:03 am (UTC)That is hell of not a thread i needed to read.
-- tom
no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 04:17 am (UTC)That he may be, but he fails to demonstrate it in that article.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 04:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 04:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 05:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:Love at first sight
Re: Love at first sight
Date: 2004-09-11 12:30 am (UTC)Re: Love at first sight
Date: 2004-09-11 09:31 am (UTC)Besides, I do mean love, not lust, at first sight.