Marginalia
Jul. 5th, 2004 07:54 pmPenguin tries to persuade men to read more by telling them the ladies like it. 78% of respondents think that people who read are likely to be much better in bed, apparently. Of course, SF still suffers from an image problem, and it's probably possible to take all these things a bit too far...
Perhaps not surprisingly, the book factor didn't show up in this recent poll about men in general. More surprising, probably, is the fact that half the women in the UK apparently think that the man should be the main breadwinner in the household. Not can be; should be. Mind you, the respondents also seem to think that Richard Branson is a suitable role-model.
Kim Stanley Robinson, author of the rather good climate-change/paradigm-shifty-thing novel Forty Signs of Rain (my review here), is not impressed with The Day After Tomorrow. And a bit gung-ho about the wonderfulness of American SF.
And speaking of SF, it's got a new definition. One of my colleagues was talking this lunchtime about the problems of filling in the reader survey of World Mission magazine as an atheist. "They also asked me what type of books I read. The options were 'catholic fiction', 'catholic non-fiction', or 'secular fiction'." No 'secular non-fiction', apparently.
A good interview with Jeff Vandermeer has one particularly wonderful quote about a book he's working on: "I think it will be one of the greatest adventure/spy stories ever told. Think Burroughs and Alasdair Gray collaborating with Nabokov and a code breaker from World War II." The mind, it boggles.
The secrets of the Cheese Man are revealed at last.
And last but not least, a question: is it wrong that parts of this make me laugh until I hurt myself?
Perhaps not surprisingly, the book factor didn't show up in this recent poll about men in general. More surprising, probably, is the fact that half the women in the UK apparently think that the man should be the main breadwinner in the household. Not can be; should be. Mind you, the respondents also seem to think that Richard Branson is a suitable role-model.
Kim Stanley Robinson, author of the rather good climate-change/paradigm-shifty-thing novel Forty Signs of Rain (my review here), is not impressed with The Day After Tomorrow. And a bit gung-ho about the wonderfulness of American SF.
And speaking of SF, it's got a new definition. One of my colleagues was talking this lunchtime about the problems of filling in the reader survey of World Mission magazine as an atheist. "They also asked me what type of books I read. The options were 'catholic fiction', 'catholic non-fiction', or 'secular fiction'." No 'secular non-fiction', apparently.
A good interview with Jeff Vandermeer has one particularly wonderful quote about a book he's working on: "I think it will be one of the greatest adventure/spy stories ever told. Think Burroughs and Alasdair Gray collaborating with Nabokov and a code breaker from World War II." The mind, it boggles.
The secrets of the Cheese Man are revealed at last.
And last but not least, a question: is it wrong that parts of this make me laugh until I hurt myself?
no subject
Date: 2004-07-05 12:57 pm (UTC)Your cheese link is missing a h.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-05 01:11 pm (UTC)Which one?
Your cheese link is missing a h.
Now fixed. Ta.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-05 02:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-05 02:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-05 02:32 pm (UTC)One of them funniest things evar.
You know what's really funny though
(also as bad: he looks like a cabbie)
Re: You know what's really funny though
Date: 2004-07-06 12:13 am (UTC)Re: You know what's really funny though
Date: 2004-07-06 06:36 am (UTC)Re: You know what's really funny though
Date: 2004-07-06 02:50 am (UTC)Kim Stanley Robinson
Date: 2004-07-05 02:59 pm (UTC)This bit was pretty ironic given he is the most European of the major American writers in terms of sensibility.
Re: Kim Stanley Robinson
Date: 2004-07-05 03:51 pm (UTC)That's the most stupid remark I've ever heard from KSR. Hey Kim - we are doing just fine over here with the beast heart trap thing.
Re: Kim Stanley Robinson
Date: 2004-07-05 11:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-05 03:06 pm (UTC)(And, yes, I know that feeble joke only works if one mispronounces your name).
no subject
Date: 2004-07-05 11:30 pm (UTC)I like living alone. Being alone is altogether less desireable. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2004-07-06 04:59 am (UTC)Veniss Underground was great. I read all of the last part on the afternoon before your do, when i was in a terrible state and needed to hide in a book. Didn't cheer me up, but certainly took me somewhere you couldn't mistake for my life. I shall have a haunting image of a woman under a pile of legs, in fact the whole cathedral sequence there, lingering in the back of my head for a long time.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-06 04:40 pm (UTC)Best review ever. :)
Glad you liked it. Now beg, borrow or force
(I'm currently working my way through his short story collection, Secret Life. 'Tis also of the good.)
Good Bonking
Date: 2004-07-06 12:03 pm (UTC)Thanks
Date: 2004-07-13 06:58 am (UTC)And I'd like to second criticism of K.S. Robinson's comment. It's an odd comment to make, I think. Most of my influences, for example, are not American at all--mostly English/Scottish/Irish, actually. There is definitely a sensibility in European fiction that is different from its U.S. counterpart, and I can't quite put my finger on what it is, but whatever it is, I usually prefer it.
Best,
Jeff VanderMeer
Re: Thanks
Date: 2004-07-14 12:37 am (UTC)And you're more than welcome for the comments. You keep writin' 'em and I'll keep buyin' 'em...!