coalescent: (Default)
[personal profile] coalescent
A number of sex-related claims crossed my news radar this weekend...

  • Kylie's bum is no longer to be used as a marketing tool.

  • The post-feminist generation of teenage girls put out incredibly mixed messages in the way they act and behave. This is causing a crisis amongst teenage boys, who are even turning to steroids to pump up their look because they just can't handle the pressure, the poor guys.

  • Online etiquette is in many ways very old-fashioned, and the rise of online relationships (over the next five years, 50% of singletons are expected to meet their partner online) is leading to a return to old-fashioned courtship.

  • The current age of consent is out of step with current teenage lifestyles. It should be lowered to 12, and far more explicit sex education should be provided. The government, on the other hand, is going to make the situation worse by making all forms of sexual contact, from kissing on up, illegal for under-16s.


...All of which, I think you'll agree, adds up to a pretty schizophrenic picture. The news about Kylie's bum is, of course, the most startling of all; frankly, I thought we'd never see the back of it it would be with us until judgement day. And the claim made for online relationships is, hearteningly, accurate (although they don't mention how much easier it is to make that one ill-judged comment that kills the mood dead).

The other two claims come from a world I don't recognise. I don't think the one about the poor teenage boys is accurate (although I'm sure there are a few grains of truth in it), since, y'know, we can think for ourselves; but even if it's all true, the article as written strikes me as contributing to the problem, rather than helping in any way. And as for the teenage sex thing - well, when I was 12 I was more into Dragonlance, Games Workshop, the local young ten-pin bowling club and, occasionally, a trip to the cinema with my friends. For most of my teenage years, going out on Saturday night was a foreign idea, as evidenced by my detailed knowledge of Casualty plots and characters c.1993-1997. I didn't have anything so advanced as a girlfriend until university (hell, or even a first kiss; there were 40 girls in my sixth form of 200 or so, and the gawky nerd with the Asimov books didn't rank very high up the eligibility scale).

But you know, I don't feel the least bit bitter about it. Well, maybe slightly bitter that I've never had the stereotypically torrid teenage romance, but in general, I'm ok with it. In fact, I liked having the age of consent there - it gave me an excuse, on the rare occasion that I needed one, for not having made any inroads into that field. Which is not to say I support the idea of making teenage experimentation illegal; it wasn't for me, then, but to outlaw it is clearly ludicrous. Similarly, more comprehensive sex education would be unambiguously A Good Thing. I just get slightly concerned on behalf of all the kids like me that society could move, from a position that is arguably too restrictive, a little too far in the opposite direction.

Intelligence

Date: 2003-11-17 02:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xsabx.livejournal.com
But you know, I don't feel the least bit bitter about it. Well, maybe slightly bitter that I've never had the stereotypically torrid teenage romance, but in general, I'm ok with it.

Welcome to my Teenage Years... :D
I think the media should have at least some of the blame laid at their door, for perpetuating the idea that you *need* to have lived your entire life three times over before you're 21. The big issue in this country then becomes the question of Whose Responsibility is it Anyway? Parents, teachers AND the media ALL need to preach the same sermon on what is acceptable behaviour (plus how that message should be pitched), and as the three are currently pulling in completely different directions...

I will miss Kylie's bum, but as I've always been behind the times... (badumb *ching!*)

Re: Intelligence

Date: 2003-11-17 02:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
Parents, teachers AND the media ALL need to preach the same sermon on what is acceptable behaviour (plus how that message should be pitched), and as the three are currently pulling in completely different directions...

And even in more than three different directions, which is particularly impressive. :-)

Personally, I'm just trying to work out what my parents did right and how I can repeat it when it's my turn.

I will miss Kylie's bum, but as I've always been behind the times

There's nothing quite like bad puns on a monday morning.

Re: Intelligence

Date: 2003-11-17 04:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xsabx.livejournal.com
Personally, I'm just trying to work out what my parents did right and how I can repeat it when it's my turn.

Pretty much what I'm doing, too. There is no truly right way, just the way that works best for you... isn't that what *they* say...?

Date: 2003-11-17 02:22 am (UTC)
ext_36172: (Default)
From: [identity profile] fba.livejournal.com
I'm not sure that I like the idea of kids growing up that quickly - but I also think that criminalising sexual active youngsters is counter-productive.....

I guess we need *proper* sex education (and now that the gawd-awful section 28 is gone teachers will feel able to ask any questions about homosexuality that may come up) - but not a good-sex-guide-for-teens. Sex education that deals with the issues of pregnancy, STDs *and* the emotional side of sex rather than just the mechanics is what is needed.....

I think the press are hyping things up a bit - but the figures for STDs amongst teens are fairly alarming - so there is obviously a problem and the current education programs aren't working..... I think that 16 is fine as an age of consent - any lower than 14 I am not comfortable with. The worst thing they could do IMO is make the AOC unequal again.....

Date: 2003-11-17 02:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
I guess we need *proper* sex education

The age of consent stuff all comes from a C4 documentary last night. They were saying, and I can believe, that full and frank sex ed raises the average age that people Do It. On the other hand, they also argued that the age of consent has no impact, which I'm less convinced by.

(They raised the 'people mature at different rates' argument, too, and whilst I'm sure that there are people mature enough at 13, I very much doubt that they're in the majority. Moreover, I would say that based on this documentary there's apparently a risk that even intelligent adults will mistake the appearance of maturity for maturity itself.)

Date: 2003-11-17 04:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] immortalradical.livejournal.com
The age of consent stuff all comes from a C4 documentary last night.

Ah, but did you watch the drama afterwards? I wasn't convinced by its value as drama, or entirely sure that it didn't go to the furthest extreme of 14-year-old experience, but a lot of it rang true from my observations (and even experiences) when I was that old. And it even steered clear of preaching until the very very end. But, then again, I did go to a pretty dire school that I was happy to escape from at 16 ... so my 14th year may be atypical.

What the drama did do, however, was make it perfectly clear that lowering the age of consent could be disastrous if not micro-managed on an almost impractical level. It attempted to be ambiguous in its conclusions (if the age of consent was lowered, would the terrible things that happened to the girls in this drama occur?), but to be honest it was pretty obviously on the side of keeping it at the level it is now, if not higher.

I was actually going to post about this myself, but you beat me to it. More programmes in the season on Tuesday, I think.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 05:06 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] immortalradical.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 06:04 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2003-11-17 02:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] itchyfidget.livejournal.com
now that the gawd-awful section 28 is gone teachers will feel able to ask any questions about homosexuality that may come up

I hope the pupils can answer their questions ;o)

Date: 2003-11-17 03:00 am (UTC)

Date: 2003-11-17 02:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snowking.livejournal.com
You missed that Kylie has the perfect bum then. I'm not convinced and I'm seeking a grant for further studies :D

Date: 2003-11-17 02:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
It's not just her, y'know. Apparently there's a whole 'less is more' movement growing.

Date: 2003-11-17 04:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ajr.livejournal.com
It's not hard to understand why there's such a movement. When you think about it, there's something disturbing about knowing that if you see an attractive young celebrity on t'telly, then you're almost guaranteed to find (semi-)naked pictures with a quick Google. So there's probably something to be said for going back to "less is more". The good old 'air of mystery' 'n all that.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 05:08 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] snowking.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 06:12 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ajr.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 06:19 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] snowking.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 06:24 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] snowking.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 06:25 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] fba.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 06:54 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] snowking.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 06:57 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 06:38 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] snowking.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 06:56 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] immortalradical.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 08:44 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ajr.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 03:59 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] xkylet.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 06:29 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2003-11-17 02:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] deccasanta.livejournal.com
(although they don't mention how much easier it is to make that one ill-judged comment that kills the mood dead).

Once again Niall kills me softly with his song. :)

Date: 2003-11-17 02:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
I just call 'em like I see 'em. :-)

Vocab Nazi smackdown

Date: 2003-11-17 02:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] itchyfidget.livejournal.com
I agree with you about all of that, I think, but I have to warn you that continuing use of the word schizophrenic to imply split personality is wrong, just wrong, and must be stopped! About 1 in 3 people in this country wrongly believe that schizophrenia = multiple personality (nuh-uh! totally different condition), and this isn't helped by widespread media misuse of the word schizophrenic (by which I shall assume you have been influenced, and are thus guiltless ;o)

This public service pedantry announcement was brought to you by itchyfidget. Have a nice day, citizen.

Re: Vocab Nazi smackdown

Date: 2003-11-17 03:02 am (UTC)
ext_36172: (Default)
From: [identity profile] fba.livejournal.com
You really ought to friend [livejournal.com profile] ajr AKA Pedanticus........

Re: Vocab Nazi smackdown

Date: 2003-11-17 03:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] itchyfidget.livejournal.com
You really ought to friend ajr AKA Pedanticus........

Consider him friended :) We pedants must stick together.

Re: Vocab Nazi smackdown

Date: 2003-11-17 03:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
Hmm:

1. Of, relating to, or affected with schizophrenia.
2. Of, relating to, or characterized by the coexistence of disparate or antagonistic elements.

(Also 'behaviour that seems to be motivated by conflicting or contradictory principles' is listed as a valid usage in the big Collins dictionary we have here at work...)

(All of which said, I do agree with you - it's a lazy shorthand that should be avoided. I'm just pointing out that it's made it into the dictionaries.)

Re: Vocab Nazi smackdown

Date: 2003-11-17 03:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] itchyfidget.livejournal.com
The misunderstanding stems from the derivation of the word schizophrenia - from Greek, split mind (coined by a fella with the fantastic name of Eugen Bleuler, about a century ago). He meant that the mind, in schizophrenia, is split off from reality, rather than from other parts of itself, but the latter notion seems to have stuck :-/

And, bah, what do dictionaries know? Next thing you know they'll be including phrases like "off one's own back" (that's BAT, thank you!) and "ecsetera [sic]" because that's what the majority of people say.

*goes to live rest of life as hermit*

Re: Vocab Nazi smackdown

From: [identity profile] hawleygriffen.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 04:14 am (UTC) - Expand

Re: Vocab Nazi smackdown

From: [identity profile] tizzle-b.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 05:35 am (UTC) - Expand

hmmmmm

Date: 2003-11-17 04:02 am (UTC)
ext_36163: (potbanger)
From: [identity profile] cleanskies.livejournal.com
Channel 4 documentaries becoming worth watching again, are they?

This was an interesting one:

"The post-feminist generation of teenage girls put out incredibly mixed messages in the way they act and behave. This is causing a crisis amongst teenage boys, who are even turning to steroids to pump up their look because they just can't handle the pressure, the poor guys."

... teenage boys turning to growth hormones + steroids isn't exactly a new phenomenon (I knew a few abusers at school) but laying it at the feet of post-feminist teenage girls is a new one on me. Avoiding bullying from (male) pupils and teachers was the reason I'd heard -- perhaps the reason is that female status has now risen sufficiently that they're beginning to be able to bully the smaller boys, too?

Being in the youth information biz, there's a lot of sex ed out there. What's been somewhat neglected (though it's beginning to return, at least in our county) is relationship education -- self respect, healthy interaction, avoiding abusive patterns, that sort of thing.

... I am so far against lowering the age of consent to 12 that I could rant for hours about it. Come on, 12? ... all this is about is legalizing the bazillion 20-year-old morons out there who want to f*** little girls because no-one their own age would be dumb enough to allow them to, and the significant proportion of 40-year-old men who wish to do the same.

There are a lot of good reasons not to feel bitter about missing out on teenage romance. The mild bitterness felt at not having had a girlfriend in your sixth form is as nothing compared to the gaping emotional wounds/wrecked exam results/pregnancy scares/substance abuse issues/esteem problems left behind by the vast majority of teenage "romances".

Re: hmmmmm

Date: 2003-11-17 05:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
Channel 4 documentaries becoming worth watching again, are they?

I'm not sure I'd go that far. :)

perhaps the reason is that female status has now risen sufficiently that they're beginning to be able to bully the smaller boys, too?

The article was suggesting it was to impress the girls, but it didn't have anything to back that speculation up.

there's a lot of sex ed out there.

All I ever got were a couple of lessons with a carrot...

I am so far against lowering the age of consent to 12 that I could rant for hours about it.

The argument seemed to be 'well, everyone's doing it at 13 anyway, so why make it illegal?' Which wasn't the most convincing position in the world.

As [livejournal.com profile] immortalradical said upthread, the drama that was on afterwards ended up making exactly your point - the main character (aged 14) gets a guy (age unspecified, but had to be at least 20) to sleep with her by telling him she's 17. Hard to see how lowering the age of consent would solve that one.

a carrot? exotic.

From: [identity profile] cleanskies.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 07:07 am (UTC) - Expand

Re: hmmmmm

From: [identity profile] snowking.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 07:29 am (UTC) - Expand

Re: hmmmmm

From: [identity profile] veggiesu.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 08:13 am (UTC) - Expand

Re: hmmmmm

From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 08:41 am (UTC) - Expand

Re: hmmmmm

From: [identity profile] veggiesu.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 08:33 am (UTC) - Expand

Re: hmmmmm

From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 08:40 am (UTC) - Expand

Re: hmmmmm

From: [identity profile] fba.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 08:52 am (UTC) - Expand

Re: hmmmmm

From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 09:02 am (UTC) - Expand

Re: hmmmmm

From: [identity profile] despotliz.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 10:07 am (UTC) - Expand

Re: hmmmmm

Date: 2003-11-17 06:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] immortalradical.livejournal.com
There are a lot of good reasons not to feel bitter about missing out on teenage romance.

I believe the kids would say to this paragraph: word.

Date: 2003-11-17 05:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ajr.livejournal.com
The post-feminist generation of teenage girls put out incredibly mixed messages in the way they act and behave.

Nothing new, in my experience. Females have always put out mixed messages, in my experience. No doubt it helps little that males are notoriously bad at reading messages even when they're not mixed.

I find the conclusion that it's driving boys to use steroids rather odd. What's wrong with having a beer or two with friends and moaning about how you'll understand women, hmm? :)

Date: 2003-11-17 06:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] itchyfidget.livejournal.com
I think the point was that girls are being 'sexualised' (ugly phrase!) - i.e., exposed to sexual imagery and media pressure to conform to ideas of what is desirable - from a much younger age than they used to be (witness the shockingly adult clothing marketed to ~8-year-olds as shown on the programme), while as a nation we have surely never been so paranoid about paedophilia/child abduction as we currently are (whipped into a frenzy by newspapers whose writers are too stupid to write about politics) so it would follow from this that mixed messages about sexuality and behaviour are getting louder.

Still can't see why women should be blamed for steroid use among teenage boys. Personally I think that's more about the increasing willingness of people to mess with their bodies to make them more "desirable" (cosmetic surgery/increases in modifications like piercings and tattoos, celeb-diets, etc).

Incidentally, Piers Morgan (yes, I know!) writes a belting column about "our" obsession with celebrity in today's Guardian. Even if he is just drumming up publicity for his new TV show. It's all part of the same problem here (when a nation of young people mainly want to be famous for its own sake, you have to wonder about our collective mental health).

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ajr.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 06:15 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] itchyfidget.livejournal.com - Date: 2003-11-17 06:26 am (UTC) - Expand
From: [identity profile] applez.livejournal.com
this would relate to all this ever-younger sexual experimentation...

Apparently on one college campus or other, a fetish club was set up using college club funds - causing a bit of a stir.

To that, one of the comedians commented, "Hey, with all this early experimentation, what are they going to have to see them through their 30s and 40s?!"

----

Seriously though, there is a value in passing up the novelty factor sooner rather than later, but so too is there a cost. I do generally agree on explicit sexual education as an unambigiously good thing.

I also worry whether a 12 year old can fully process an interactive/mutually-shared sexual experience.

I also feel there is certainly some death of romance in all this.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Profile

coalescent: (Default)
Niall

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jan. 23rd, 2026 06:23 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
March 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2012