Political Survey
Nov. 7th, 2003 12:12 pm
I think that's more-or-less where I'd have put myself, although there were some questions (mostly the economic ones) where I answered 'no opinion' through ignorance rather than a strict lack of an opinion. I also had the usual problem with this sort of test where my response to general statement x is 'well, it depends on the circumstances!'
I'm also not sure exactly what the idealist/pragmatist axis actually means, in practical terms, and in any case I'm not entirely convinced that political opinions can be accurately represented in two dimensions. So I guess it's a good thing that the test is being used to examine whether those assumptions are valid.
But all that said, yes, it's more-or-less where I'd put myself.
My full results are here. The test is here.
no subject
Date: 2003-11-07 06:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-11-07 06:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-11-07 08:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-11-07 06:42 am (UTC)Well no. But it's better than the standard left/right 1D axis I was taught in school. Here's me btw:
no subject
Date: 2003-11-07 06:48 am (UTC)moi
Date: 2003-11-07 06:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-11-07 07:52 am (UTC)full results.
no subject
Date: 2003-11-07 08:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-11-07 08:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-11-07 10:15 am (UTC)last time, I was definitely in the idealistic left box, but near the pragmatic-idealistic line. but now....
agree with niall on some of the questions i wanted to answer, "depending on the circumstances" or just "i don't know."
no subject
Date: 2003-11-07 08:07 am (UTC)Am I the most "left"?
Date: 2003-11-07 10:33 am (UTC)Yeah, took those before...
sadly...
Date: 2003-11-08 01:05 am (UTC)Re: sadly...
Date: 2003-11-08 09:53 am (UTC)sadly...
Date: 2003-11-08 11:32 am (UTC)Re: sadly...
Date: 2003-11-08 08:11 pm (UTC)If you take issue with others using a tool as yours for their political purposes - take it up with them.
Incidentally, I found similar flaws with the model - the problems of context, two dimensions, definitions, and consequences.
Incidentally, I was ...
I would also concur that it 'depends' a great deal, and sometimes I decided purely on the strictest definition of a word. For example, I do believe that 'aggressive' foreign policy can stop terrorism, but I totally disagree that 'bellicose' foreign policy can stop terrorism.
Likewise there were a lot of 'yes, but...'