heh, its all good. I might reply to those ones, i haven't come up with anything to add to the ontopic stuff. Everything i come up with appears to have been covered by one of the usual suspects ;-)
Yes, but if we all start vindicating ourselves because we're better than Niall ... well, it's a slippery slope, a rocky road and other alliterative perilous paths.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2003-04-03 06:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-04-03 03:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-04-03 07:51 am (UTC)Dan
no subject
Date: 2003-04-03 07:57 am (UTC)The (potential) shame!
Date: 2003-04-03 08:10 am (UTC)Also, I'm all out of image-related ideas.
Re: The (potential) shame!
Date: 2003-04-03 08:13 am (UTC)And I don't think your username is lame. Well, not that lame.
Re: The (potential) shame!
Date: 2003-04-03 09:15 am (UTC);-p
---
Re: The (potential) shame!
Date: 2003-04-03 01:12 pm (UTC)Re: The (potential) shame!
Date: 2003-04-03 01:45 pm (UTC)i did not know that. i should apologise for my OT posts then :)
Re: The (potential) shame!
Date: 2003-04-03 01:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-04-03 01:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-04-03 01:49 pm (UTC)hate to say it, but word.
no subject
Date: 2003-04-03 03:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-04-03 01:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-04-03 02:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-04-03 02:02 pm (UTC)