Page Summary
nuttyxander.livejournal.com - (no subject)
coalescent.livejournal.com - (no subject)
midnightmelody.livejournal.com - (no subject)
nuttyxander.livejournal.com - (no subject)
blackbeltbarbie.livejournal.com - (no subject)
swisstone.livejournal.com - (no subject)
coalescent.livejournal.com - (no subject)
iainjclark.livejournal.com - (no subject)
coalescent.livejournal.com - (no subject)
coalescent.livejournal.com - (no subject)
brixtonbrood.livejournal.com - (no subject)
surliminal.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ajr.livejournal.com - (no subject)
blackbeltbarbie.livejournal.com - (no subject)
coalescent.livejournal.com - (no subject)
despotliz.livejournal.com - (no subject)
palatinate.livejournal.com - (no subject)
iainjclark.livejournal.com - (no subject)
johnnyeponymous.livejournal.com - What good is it?
surliminal.livejournal.com - (no subject)
brixtonbrood.livejournal.com - Re: What good is it?
dsky.livejournal.com - (no subject)
frostfox.livejournal.com - Re: What good is it?
del-c.livejournal.com - (no subject)
i-ate-my-crusts.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Base style: Brittle by
- Theme: Rust by
Page generated Jul. 27th, 2025 05:16 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
no subject
Date: 2006-12-25 08:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-25 08:22 pm (UTC)Actually, I think I quite like some of the things the episode was trying to do. But the execution was a bit, er, hysterical and muddled.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-25 08:27 pm (UTC)Also, why did The Doctor make snow? And did he really believe that the Annoying Bride could 'be magnificent'?
no subject
Date: 2006-12-25 08:33 pm (UTC)Also, it felt really wrong somehow for the little kiddees to be first excited at the Tardis chase and later in peril in stereotypical US movie fashion only to be saved by an adult. Natch.
Also,
It all felt a little rushed, and a bit of a cut-and-shut job mashing together various other episodes. Does RTD only have a finite number of (Xmas Special in particular) ideas or what?
no subject
Date: 2006-12-25 08:37 pm (UTC)I like that they didn't ignore Rose, but it did feel rushed. And a little more panto then usual.
My Dad and I where talking earlier about how it pissed us off that every Christmas film seems to end with snow, so we laughed at the snow at the end.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-25 08:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-25 08:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-25 08:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-25 08:59 pm (UTC)Your lack of arbitrary judgement displeases me.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-25 09:02 pm (UTC)Well, more consistently annoying than usual, at least. Which may or may not have been deliberate, since I don't usually find his mannerisms that annoying, and here I virtually cheered both times he got slapped.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-25 09:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-25 09:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-25 09:23 pm (UTC)On the other hand, I'd been drinking rather a lot of wine.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-25 09:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-25 09:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-25 10:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-25 11:33 pm (UTC)I agree it was a bit panto but I didn't mind that. Whilst RTD has a track record that's a bit left-field superficially, when it comes to Dr Who he's very traditional - from the start he's been careful to protect the "institution". And Christmas specials are a Beeb tradition going back decades - not only in variety but special episodes of drama series, often with added humour.
We're not a typical audience so I think occasionally it's worth us reminding ourselves that the BBC sees Dr Who as not only an institution but "classic family entertainment" and I think it probably worked well for the core audience they have in mind. Indeed, as a cultural observer I find it fascinating to watch the game that's being played out with the mass audience as the BBC team tries to be original yet always carries its historical baggage of approach and style around with it. To escape that fully I think it usually needs a totally original show with no history and often on a lesser network (X-Files, B5 ...).
no subject
Date: 2006-12-25 11:36 pm (UTC)What good is it?
Date: 2006-12-26 12:26 am (UTC)What good is it having UK folks on my FList if there's no spoilerage goin' on on the Who front?
Chris
no subject
Date: 2006-12-26 12:27 am (UTC)Re: What good is it?
Date: 2006-12-26 12:31 am (UTC)Also killer robot Santas.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-26 12:57 am (UTC)But maybe it's just me.
I haven't voted, because I'm utterly undecided. As you say, it was better than Torchwood, but generally that means it was merely more pleasant than rectal surgery preformed with a shovel.
Re: What good is it?
Date: 2006-12-26 01:11 am (UTC)But we had also had rather a lot of good red wine which might have influenced judgement.
Easy mindless viewing for xmas day eve. Could have been much, much worse.
FF
no subject
Date: 2006-12-26 08:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-26 08:25 am (UTC)