But wouldn't most people's lists look something like that when stripped down to such reductive terms?
I don't know. Wouldn't they cluster more? I tend to think most people would either include three or four comics or no comics, for instance.
Wheeler himself, who strikes me as writing in bad faith from the title down, suggests the problem with the list is it is not by the numbers enough (no Dune, too many minor works.)
The problem with which is that we can't tell whether Izkoff hasn't read them or has read them but didn't like them.
Also, how often can A.R.Yngve pop up to make the same comment?
Well, he hasn't made it here yet. Clearly I'm not high-profile enough.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-07 02:04 pm (UTC)I don't know. Wouldn't they cluster more? I tend to think most people would either include three or four comics or no comics, for instance.
Wheeler himself, who strikes me as writing in bad faith from the title down, suggests the problem with the list is it is not by the numbers enough (no Dune, too many minor works.)
The problem with which is that we can't tell whether Izkoff hasn't read them or has read them but didn't like them.
Also, how often can A.R.Yngve pop up to make the same comment?
Well, he hasn't made it here yet. Clearly I'm not high-profile enough.