Inevitably
Dec. 13th, 2002 12:00 amWhich SF author are you?
You are: Hal Clement (Harry C. Stubbs)
A quiet and underrated master of "hard science" fiction who, among other things, foresaw integrated circuits back in the 1940s.
That'll do.
You are: Hal Clement (Harry C. Stubbs)
A quiet and underrated master of "hard science" fiction who, among other things, foresaw integrated circuits back in the 1940s.
That'll do.
no subject
Date: 2002-12-12 04:30 pm (UTC)anyhoo....
Samuel R. Delany
Few have had such broad commercial success with aggressively experimental prose techniques.
so tell me informed people, what's he all about then?
no subject
This pessimistic Pole has spent a whole career telling ironic stories of futility and frustration. Yet he is also a master of wordplay so witty that it sparkles even when translated into English.'
Waaaah, I'm a pessimist! My life is ovvveerrr!
no subject
Date: 2002-12-12 05:20 pm (UTC)no subject
You are:
Kurt Vonnegut
For years, this unique creator of absurd and haunting tales denied that he had anything to do with science fiction.
I'm the writer of 'Cat's Cradle', which is pretty close to being one of my favouritest books ever. Peachy keen.
Plus he's a guru on the in-joke-tastic True Meaning Of Life. See?
no subject
Date: 2002-12-13 06:27 am (UTC)This old-fashioned writer may be the most unapologetic capitalist in the field. He has also been influential in many other areas, from space policy to the home computer industry.
'Oo?
no subject
Date: 2002-12-13 08:42 am (UTC)Isaac Asimov
One of the most prolific writers in history, on any imaginable subject. Cared little for art but created lasting and memorable tales.
Um..whatever. Slight change (on one question I couldn't quite seem to decide on) and I end up with
Philip K. Dick.
The brilliant yet trashy master of the reality warp always left you unsure of what was real, but never forgot compassion.
no subject
Date: 2002-12-13 03:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-12-13 03:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-12-13 03:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-12-13 03:29 pm (UTC)And if you've never read any Asmiov, here's your reading list:
- Foundation
- Foundation and Empire
- Second Foundation
- I, Robot
- The Caves Of Steel
- Nightfall (the short story, not the novel)
- The Gods Themselves
no subject
Date: 2002-12-13 04:09 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-12-13 04:37 pm (UTC)Assure me this is not just some very disturbing punning, would you? Please?
[reading list]
Curse you, Harrison! CURSE YOU!!! Or possibly, thanks. I can't seem to decide...
*glances at pile 'o' 14 unread books*
Hmmm....
*scribbles titles on his 'books to buy' list.....*sigh*...ah well...*
;-)
Re:
Date: 2002-12-14 06:53 am (UTC)woo hoo!
Date: 2002-12-14 12:03 pm (UTC)James Tiptree, Jr. (Alice B. Sheldon)
In the 1970s she was perhaps the most memorable, and one of the most popular, short story writers.
I couldn't have asked for a better result. What a great quiz. And accurate spelling, too!
Re: woo hoo!
Date: 2002-12-14 12:10 pm (UTC)If so, yes, she's great.
Re: woo hoo!
Date: 2002-12-14 12:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-12-14 01:44 pm (UTC)From Book a minute
"I, Robot
By Isaac Asimov
Ultra-Condensed by Geoffrey Brent
Isaac Asimov
Here's a logic puzzle thinly disguised as a story.
Reader
Hurray!
THE END"
And don't be tempted to read any more Foundation than Niall outlined. Really.
no subject
Date: 2002-12-14 01:49 pm (UTC)And there's nowt wrong with that.
And don't be tempted to read any more Foundation than Niall outlined. Really.
I think Forward The Foundation has its merits. But yeah, the later Foundation books aren't as good as the initial three, mostly because he's trying to reconcile the Robot and Foundation stories into one unholy, uh, whole.
That said, if you do end up reading them, go the whole hog and read the Benford/Bear/Brin trilogy of spinoffs. The Brin one in particular actually does a fair job of making the whole thing make sense...
no subject
Date: 2002-12-14 04:25 pm (UTC)And there's nowt wrong with that.
Yes there is. Moreso when it's an entire book of them.