Marginalia
Aug. 1st, 2004 01:02 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
coalescentYet another definition of SF: Jeff Vandermeer's Strange Fiction list at Amazon contains three books I've read (Lanark, The Master and Margarita and From Hell) and several I want to read (The House of Leaves, The Chess Garden, The Infernal Desire Machines of Doctor Hoffman).
How to interpretuser icons Friendster photos.
The argument for GM athletes. I'm sure this article accidentally fell through a time portal from ten years into the future.
Carnivale on DVD in December, maybe?
Stross and Doctorow (mostly Stross) on the singularity and other things. The article is reprinted from Popular Science, and seems to be largely based on interviews carried out at Plokta.con.
A serious physics-related link. A slightly less serious physics-related link.
If you compare this ('The truth is, robots of the potty cinematic future just don’t compute. Isn’t it about time we got over this rampant technophobia?') to this ('From the 1950s to the 1970s, robots carried a heavy weight of themes - humanity, identity, labour, slavery - on uncomplaining metal shoulders. And then they went away. They became, as I recall Paul MacAuley saying on a panel at Trincon 2, dead tech, like food pills and psi powers and tractor beams. They died and went to heaven - into satire and skiffy, in Red Dwarf and Star Wars, and into cyberspace, where their dematerialised descendants haunt our imaginations as the AI.') it's obvious that yes, media SF really is still fifty years behind written SF.
How to interpret
The argument for GM athletes. I'm sure this article accidentally fell through a time portal from ten years into the future.
Carnivale on DVD in December, maybe?
Stross and Doctorow (mostly Stross) on the singularity and other things. The article is reprinted from Popular Science, and seems to be largely based on interviews carried out at Plokta.con.
A serious physics-related link. A slightly less serious physics-related link.
If you compare this ('The truth is, robots of the potty cinematic future just don’t compute. Isn’t it about time we got over this rampant technophobia?') to this ('From the 1950s to the 1970s, robots carried a heavy weight of themes - humanity, identity, labour, slavery - on uncomplaining metal shoulders. And then they went away. They became, as I recall Paul MacAuley saying on a panel at Trincon 2, dead tech, like food pills and psi powers and tractor beams. They died and went to heaven - into satire and skiffy, in Red Dwarf and Star Wars, and into cyberspace, where their dematerialised descendants haunt our imaginations as the AI.') it's obvious that yes, media SF really is still fifty years behind written SF.
