Marginalia
Jul. 12th, 2004 10:42 pmProbably old to many, but new to me: an entertaining discussion about the definition of sci-fi. And whilst I'm on old hobby-horses, how about an article on the hostility of lit fans towards media fans (with some SF vs fantasy snobbery thrown in for good measure)?
An article observing the move of sf TV to cable. Has anyone seen or heard anything about 4400?
More worthily (...), Jeff Vandermeer suggests summer reading from the edges of genre; and Daniel Blackston provides an essay on Jeffrey Ford's Nebula-winning novellette, 'The Empire of Ice-Cream', here
Chris Priest reviews River of Gods, which after slipping down last month is finally back at the top of my to-read pile, because...
I've most recently read Tony Ballantyne's debut novel, Recursion. Black humour, social satire, layered ambiguity, creepy Von Neuman machines and real, serious science fiction Ideas in only 350 pages: I liked it. A review will be appearing on Diverse Books in due course.
An article observing the move of sf TV to cable. Has anyone seen or heard anything about 4400?
More worthily (...), Jeff Vandermeer suggests summer reading from the edges of genre; and Daniel Blackston provides an essay on Jeffrey Ford's Nebula-winning novellette, 'The Empire of Ice-Cream', here
Chris Priest reviews River of Gods, which after slipping down last month is finally back at the top of my to-read pile, because...
I've most recently read Tony Ballantyne's debut novel, Recursion. Black humour, social satire, layered ambiguity, creepy Von Neuman machines and real, serious science fiction Ideas in only 350 pages: I liked it. A review will be appearing on Diverse Books in due course.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-12 03:28 pm (UTC)It seems to be Close Encounters of the Third Kind meets The X-Files, with 4400 alien abductees from different decades being returned to earth, not having aged. Each one has some kind of mysterious power. There's an agency investigating them, although much of the story seems to be that of the abductees themselves.
Hope it's better than the recent Spielberg mini Taken.
See also some variable reviews and the official site
no subject
Date: 2004-07-12 03:31 pm (UTC)I tend to agree with Mitch Wagner when he says:
Eschewing the term "sci-fi" in favor of "SF" seems to me to be putting on airs. ... It's like when Trekkies get all upset because you call them Trekkies rather than Trekkers.
It always struck me that SF was a code word for entry into the fan *community*, rather than something obvious to those who are simply fans of the genre. The notion that regular readers would automatically think the term sci-fi was bad seems silly to me. People invent terminology when they want to feel elite, which is why I always assumed members of the fan community adopted the term SF. Am I wrong?
Sci-fi? SF?
Using 'SF' as I do, I must acknowledge that the two letters are hardly very popular amongst native San Franciscans, largely because SF can be taken to mean 'San Fernando' or even worse locations... ;-)
Yup, you've pretty much covered it...
Date: 2004-07-12 03:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-12 04:23 pm (UTC)It's not an easy novel but certainly is an impressive one, possibly too long and possibly too detailed, but then McDonald does like to do prose: he clearly wants this book to be experienced rather than merely read.
Re: Sci-fi? SF?
Date: 2004-07-12 04:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-12 10:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-13 12:10 am (UTC)And I agree about the stupidity of looking down on media fans, while still feeling that I've seen great fiction in written form more than in visual form. But that's not restricted to SF - Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas is a great film, but it's never going to be the book. Having said that, I'd much rather watch LOTR than read it.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-13 12:21 am (UTC)I don't know why I have this definition, only that I always have. I think the issue comes from the fact that SF is the older term, and sci-fi only appeared when the mainstream wanted an easy label for the stuff.
I am amused by this:
But I most strongly agree with this:
Re: Sci-fi? SF?
Date: 2004-07-13 12:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-13 12:23 am (UTC)I may look into getting copies.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-13 12:27 am (UTC)This occured to me too, although I haven't actually read Brunner myself, only about him. Normally you get a future that (like, say, the one in Recursion) focuses on the effects of one or two developments; River of Gods seems to be doing them all. AI, global warming, gender imbalance (and nutes), possible alien contact, increased prominence of second/third-world countries...it is overwhelming, but I've got to say that so far (100 pages in) I'm loving it.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-13 12:32 am (UTC)Oh, hell yes. :)
There are also responses to the Strange Horizons piece by Nick Mamatas here and Matthew Cheney here.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-13 12:35 am (UTC)(From here, in response to the Strange Horizons article.)
no subject
Date: 2004-07-13 01:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-13 01:06 am (UTC)Re: Sci-fi? SF?
Date: 2004-07-13 06:48 am (UTC)Hold on...
Incidentally, I still need to see the new SG-1 season, and the SG:Atlantis.
Re: Sci-fi? SF?
Date: 2004-07-13 06:55 am (UTC)Re: Sci-fi? SF?
Date: 2004-07-13 07:10 am (UTC)(don't make me 'Whaaaa' you! ;-) )
no subject
Date: 2004-07-14 05:52 am (UTC)Paul Di Filipo also mentions the Brunner link in his review.
You really should read Stand On Zanzibar, it's one of those classics that deserves its status and has stayed fresh. You can see the whole of cyberpunk lurking inside it waiting to burst out.