Art and Politics
Aug. 6th, 2003 11:05 amWhen David Frost asked Tracy Emin on his TV show why her bed was a work of art, she replied 'because I say it is'. He didn't then ask her, as he could have done, 'But who says you're an artist?'. Artists don't, by any means, hold all the cards. They are free to try to be artists, but others are also free to decide for themselves whether they have achieved this goal.
An interesting quote from an article over at Spiked that otherwise seems to be under the impression that it's still 1999:
There is a cynicism in the heart of much that passes for art today, which sits oddly with its claim to be art. After all, art has to be positive, even when it deals with the most depressing aspects of experience, because if it isn't what is the point of making it? But far from seeking a positive response to its work, the establishment art of today actually stimulates a negative reaction.
New Labour cannot be accused of doing that, but there is a cynicism in its thinking too, because where can one go if one wants to oppose it? You are either with New Labour, or nowhere, and that is not a healthy state of affairs for either politics or art.
OK, maybe I'm overstating things a little (I'm not really engaged enough with modern art to judge its value), but whilst I think that the above may have been an accurate representation of the state of politics three or four years ago, I'm not convinced it's true now - if only because of the spectacular and prolonged New Labour implosion of the last six months.