The Oxford Union (College Girls 2)
Sep. 15th, 2002 10:36 pmSo, the second installment of C4's documentary focused on this example of Union Hackery. Since I never got anywhere near the Union scene - never even went to a Union Ball, despite being a member - it made interesting viewing. What struck me most was that everyone involved seemed to be very deliberately playing at being a politician. For all that Lucy Aitkens clearly wanted to reach the top of the greasy pole, and however serious the participants claimed they were, it still seemed to me that for all concerned it was merely an extravagant and glorious game. Children dressing up in their parent's clothes and trying to be grown-up.
Despite that, I still don't see the Union as a bad thing. It's archaic and extravagant and very likely corrupt, but Oxford would be the poorer for its lost. Not because it would miss out on the occasional interesting speakers that turn up, and certainly not because the student newspapers would have to find something else to write about; but just because it adds colour.
(And whatever the Hacks may think, the average student really doesn't care about the politics - winning candidates in the elections pick up several hundred votes, hardly a representative sample)
I wonder whether there are equivalent institutions at other universities? I'm assuming the Cambridge and Durham Union Societies are at least superficially similar, but beyond that I don't know.
Google is a remarkable thing. It seems Ms Aitkens went on to found a website (this was after she became Union President and was criticised by Ted Heath, you understand), and that last September she was studying in New York.
Despite that, I still don't see the Union as a bad thing. It's archaic and extravagant and very likely corrupt, but Oxford would be the poorer for its lost. Not because it would miss out on the occasional interesting speakers that turn up, and certainly not because the student newspapers would have to find something else to write about; but just because it adds colour.
(And whatever the Hacks may think, the average student really doesn't care about the politics - winning candidates in the elections pick up several hundred votes, hardly a representative sample)
I wonder whether there are equivalent institutions at other universities? I'm assuming the Cambridge and Durham Union Societies are at least superficially similar, but beyond that I don't know.
Google is a remarkable thing. It seems Ms Aitkens went on to found a website (this was after she became Union President and was criticised by Ted Heath, you understand), and that last September she was studying in New York.
no subject
Date: 2002-09-15 03:40 pm (UTC)I approve of ours in general, because it does have entertaining speakers, like John Malkovich coming to slag off Labour MPs and get in the paper, and because the free debate is usually entertaining. Plus it gives Varsity and the Cam Student, our two newspapers, something else to argue over other than the University branch of the Tory Party.
Shame I forgot to watch College Girls tonight, it sounded more interesting than last week's.
LUU
Date: 2002-09-15 04:05 pm (UTC)Re: LUU
Date: 2002-09-15 04:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-09-16 01:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-09-16 11:02 am (UTC)Re: LUU
Date: 2002-09-16 11:04 am (UTC)Ah, the Oxford Union isn't a student union, you see. The student union is OUSU. Confusing, I know.
OUSU doesn't have the Nazis, as far as I know, but does have a fairly vocal pro-life lobby. :-/
Unions ahoy
Date: 2002-09-16 11:40 am (UTC)Yeah, we have the Union, the Student's Union, and the Union Society. It gets damn confusing.
Our Student's Union is fairly crap, due to a lot of the powere being in the hands of the colleges anyway, and because for about the past 10 years they have been trying to acquire a central union building and failing miserably. In the elections this year we had 5 candidates for President, of which one was a guy whose main manifesto pledge was to "build more hills" as Cambridge was too flat, and one was Winston, the Churchill College football mascot, ie a man in a giant dog costume.
Winston came 3rd.
no subject
Date: 2002-09-17 12:54 pm (UTC)David
no subject
Date: 2002-09-18 01:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-20 11:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-20 11:22 am (UTC)As for the criticism--You're quite right that I don't know her, but I specifically said as much in the post. This was a reaction to College Girls, in that it was about a part of Oxford I didn't experience, and it didn't seem to me to pain a favourable portrait. I'm sorry if you (or she) are offended.
Wow
Date: 2004-12-20 12:05 pm (UTC)Have a nice life,
Lucien