Freedom Fries
Mar. 11th, 2003 11:00 pm"The cafeteria menus in the three House office buildings changed the name of 'french fries' to 'freedom fries', in a culinary rebuke of France stemming from anger over the country's refusal to support the US position on Iraq."
Say whatnow?
I'd write something about how utterly crazy this is, except that
...
Date: 2003-03-11 03:17 pm (UTC)What next, hey?
Date: 2003-03-11 03:29 pm (UTC)Re: ...
Date: 2003-03-11 03:47 pm (UTC)...
Date: 2003-03-11 03:52 pm (UTC)merely wryly commented on over-usage of buffy-esque language, which is always a crime.
Yes, we've entered one of those odd periods of history...
Date: 2003-03-11 04:40 pm (UTC)Quite a bit of boycott activity is apparently underway, and more than a little rabid French rubbishing, beyond the norm.
In California, however, where it supplies most of its own culinary needs, French wines are often more affordable than Californian ones ... and would be more popular but for the still less-expensive Chilean and Spanish imports. :-)
---
Re: What next, hey?
Date: 2003-03-11 04:42 pm (UTC)----
Of course, I wonder how much longer it'll take before...
Date: 2003-03-11 04:47 pm (UTC)Doubleplusgood comrade!
----
Re: What next, hey?
Date: 2003-03-11 04:55 pm (UTC)One from the quotations file:
Date: 2003-03-12 01:48 am (UTC)- The Eye In The Pyramid, Shea and Wilson
Re: Yes, we've entered one of those odd periods of history...
Date: 2003-03-12 04:35 am (UTC)Was watching a (well made) documentary on the Iraq campaign last night, and the sound bytes of people on the street (who seriously believe Iraq can harm the US directly. With nuclear strikes and biochem attacks. Pfffft.) just scared me.
Re: Yes, we've entered one of those odd periods of history...
Date: 2003-03-12 12:57 pm (UTC)3,000-odd people killed in a terrorist plane strike, and we bollox the world economy to bomb anyone who seems a convenient excuse.
Nevermind the 11,000-odd Americans *Americans* kill every year with firearms ...
or the 40,000 who die in car accidents every year, upwards of 80% due to drink driving/drunk driving.
Reasonable expenditure of priority resources?