coalescent: (Default)
Niall ([personal profile] coalescent) wrote2007-08-29 10:18 am

Who's missing?

[Poll #1046886]

Actual answer here. Vote before you click.

EDIT: See also [livejournal.com profile] jlassen's two entries, and Andrew Wheeler here.

FURTHER EDIT: Commentary from [livejournal.com profile] rosefox here and [livejournal.com profile] cristalia here.

[identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com 2007-08-29 08:54 pm (UTC)(link)
We appear to be vigorously agreeing with one another. The question, if you like, is whether the five names they chose will get them the biggest possible defineable audience, compared to another five names they could have chosen.
cofax7: climbing on an abbey wall  (Default)

[personal profile] cofax7 2007-08-30 04:04 pm (UTC)(link)
OTOH, thinking about it, I wonder if it's in the long run a poor strategy.

If I'm someone who geeks out over the presence of Sterling and Shepherd and Ford on the cover (and the cover art), and buys the collection--and then I read it, and I find Wilce and Gunn and McHugh and Lanagan not to my taste--do I buy the next one? Or do I piss off, disgruntled?

[identity profile] joeboo-k.livejournal.com 2007-08-31 02:29 am (UTC)(link)
Possibly, but I suppose the real hope is that you've never heard of McHugh, Gunn, or Lanagan and it turns out you like them just as much as Ford and Shepard.

In my case, Ford and Shepard are the two names that sell the anthology, Beagle is an important name I know, and the rest are either "I've heard of her" or "Who?" and Maybe, just maybe I'll like them. As it stands, I know Ford's work and he is hugely hit or miss with me. Botch Town, a current World Fantasy Award nominee for Novella did not work at all, but "The Way He Does It" was fantastic. Lucius Shepard is the real selling point for me.

As such, my vote went like this: Beagle, Shepard, Ford, Sterling, McHugh