ext_12818: (Default)
Iain Clark ([identity profile] iainjclark.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] coalescent 2006-12-26 08:13 pm (UTC)

1. anything at the other end of a 6,000km hole is not an imminent threat

We don't really have enough information about the aliens to make this assessment, I would argue. Maybe they're all on hoverbikes. ;-) Or can teleport up the tube like their queen once awake, unless drowned first. I appreciate that proper SF would have bothered to explain how this was going to work, but in a James Bond underground-base-style denouement it's enough that we know the aliens are going to pose a threat once they get out, and that whenever they arrive it'll be really really bad.

2. emptying the Thames into something that size isn't going to make a noticeable difference to anything

It won't fill the hole. It could certainly fill the spaceship at the bottom of it, which I assumed was the point.

there's the Huon particles,

The Huon particles are, I agree, arbitrary and problematic. They bother me a bit more than the stonking big hole.

and oh, pretty much every emotional arc in the piece

Que?

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting