Read his post again -- neither does he, and neither do I
OK, two things; first up, as far as I can see, he does. I could be wrong, of course - I have a history of Reading It Wrong. But it certainly reads as if this is a problem for him. And secondly, if you don't think so, why bother quoting that part of the post?
What matters is that the show takes the concepts it uses seriously on its own terms. And "The Runaway Bride" didn't
I have no idea what you're saying here; it doesn't seem to relate to anything you've said in this thread. So there's things in the show that aren't plausible science; so what? How is that the show "not taking seriously the concepts it uses on it's own terms"? I would have thought that's exactly what it's doing.
no subject
OK, two things; first up, as far as I can see, he does. I could be wrong, of course - I have a history of Reading It Wrong. But it certainly reads as if this is a problem for him. And secondly, if you don't think so, why bother quoting that part of the post?
What matters is that the show takes the concepts it uses seriously on its own terms. And "The Runaway Bride" didn't
I have no idea what you're saying here; it doesn't seem to relate to anything you've said in this thread. So there's things in the show that aren't plausible science; so what? How is that the show "not taking seriously the concepts it uses on it's own terms"? I would have thought that's exactly what it's doing.