ext_6238 ([identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] coalescent 2006-12-26 02:53 pm (UTC)

But my point was that it isn't a problem that Who routinely violates scientific plausibility -- the problem is that this episode did it so excessively and clumsily that it ended up violating the principles of good storytelling.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting